We don't need a cdc that redacts ANY information. What ever would be the purpose of having a government agency that tells us nothing? We got the cia and fbi for that.
I don't know if they collect patient names with their data, but if they do - and that patient is a minor child - I could see it being redacted. All 148 pages though? C'mon. They take us for fools.
They wouldn't use the actual patient names, regardless of age, in any study. There would be no patient identifiers; that being said, no, I am pretty sure that they used only adults in their study.
Can we assume just from this study that the results show that the vax causes myocarditis?
If it showed that the vax didn't cause myocarditis, it would be shown far and wide.
It's like this:
Everyone: "Does the vax cause mycarditis?"
CDC: "Not tellling you!"
We don't need a cdc that redacts ANY information. What ever would be the purpose of having a government agency that tells us nothing? We got the cia and fbi for that.
I don't know if they collect patient names with their data, but if they do - and that patient is a minor child - I could see it being redacted. All 148 pages though? C'mon. They take us for fools.
They wouldn't use the actual patient names, regardless of age, in any study. There would be no patient identifiers; that being said, no, I am pretty sure that they used only adults in their study.
Didn't know that about names, but it makes sense. Thanks!