In the cosmos, there is a creator who is sovereign. The enemy who doesn't play by the rules will necessarily eventually get caught and destroyed because one cannot violate the rules forever.
But as soon as you compromise yourself by playing dirty like the enemy, you yourself then become liable, and stand on the exact same foundation as that enemy.
Did you consider that DJT baited them into all of this crazy warfare stuff/ Does he look worried? Clarifying that a president has immunity with regards to official acts but NOT with regards to unofficial acts is going to be critical to holding previous presidents to account, if ever.
DJT is in zero danger. It is they who are exposed, more and more and more. (FYI, they've been going to 'get trump' for oh, 7 years now. Do you really think they are going to do it in 2024? What has changed? Nothing.)
I'm talking about self defense. If I walk up to a man and punch him in the face, that's a crime. If he's telling me he's going to kill my wife and I punch him in the face, that's self defense.
We have got to get over this naive and juvenile idea that we have to let predators run will and hopefully circumstances stances will save us after decades have passed, we are not protecting the innocent and that's evil and cowardess. It's not noble and it isn't righteous.
Who taught you to think like you do? The predators. I guarantee it. We have all been manipulated to be passive in the face of their aggression because that makes us the better man. But that's after school special conditioning.
The good guys have no more right to sacrifice us to their plans than the bad guys.
Thanks for the reply. You're making way too many assumptions about how I think, what i think, and also for including me in
"We have all been manipulated to be passive in the face of their aggression because that makes us the better man".
Something I think is utter nonsense, no offense. By which I mean, both that "we all have" (that's not true) and also that "being passive in the face of aggression makes one a better man". I never have, and never will think that way. I cannot speak for others.
Myself, I was talking merely about what to do when your opponent does not play by the rules.
Appropriate and applicable self defense is exactly playing by the rules, so i really don't know what your thinking is.
Moreover, taking responsibility to self-defense is not only playing by the rules, it's called being responsible. But being underhanded, going out and taking someone out because you are scared, or being dishonest because its you vs them, this is not playing by the rules, imo.
I think we're probably in agreement, but I don't agree with your characterization of my thinking OR for including me in those people you think have been conditioned to the way of thinking you describe.
The idea that being passive in the face of agression is noble is all over the place. It's deep in our culture. It's cooked in.
What happens to a kid in school that defends himself from a bully? Is he a hero? Nope. Is he praised and supported? Nope. Why? Because passivity is valued.
We regularly see self defense criminalized.
That's why they've killed millions of us over the last century, and gotten away with it. We won't oppose then in a way they respect. That's part of why they hate us and see us as sheep and cattle. We act like it. And we've let THEM train us how to think and act.
When I point this out, people object, even though it's right in front of them daily.
In the cosmos, there is a creator who is sovereign. The enemy who doesn't play by the rules will necessarily eventually get caught and destroyed because one cannot violate the rules forever.
But as soon as you compromise yourself by playing dirty like the enemy, you yourself then become liable, and stand on the exact same foundation as that enemy.
Did you consider that DJT baited them into all of this crazy warfare stuff/ Does he look worried? Clarifying that a president has immunity with regards to official acts but NOT with regards to unofficial acts is going to be critical to holding previous presidents to account, if ever.
DJT is in zero danger. It is they who are exposed, more and more and more. (FYI, they've been going to 'get trump' for oh, 7 years now. Do you really think they are going to do it in 2024? What has changed? Nothing.)
I'm talking about self defense. If I walk up to a man and punch him in the face, that's a crime. If he's telling me he's going to kill my wife and I punch him in the face, that's self defense.
We have got to get over this naive and juvenile idea that we have to let predators run will and hopefully circumstances stances will save us after decades have passed, we are not protecting the innocent and that's evil and cowardess. It's not noble and it isn't righteous.
Who taught you to think like you do? The predators. I guarantee it. We have all been manipulated to be passive in the face of their aggression because that makes us the better man. But that's after school special conditioning.
The good guys have no more right to sacrifice us to their plans than the bad guys.
Thanks for the reply. You're making way too many assumptions about how I think, what i think, and also for including me in
Something I think is utter nonsense, no offense. By which I mean, both that "we all have" (that's not true) and also that "being passive in the face of aggression makes one a better man". I never have, and never will think that way. I cannot speak for others.
Myself, I was talking merely about what to do when your opponent does not play by the rules.
Appropriate and applicable self defense is exactly playing by the rules, so i really don't know what your thinking is.
Moreover, taking responsibility to self-defense is not only playing by the rules, it's called being responsible. But being underhanded, going out and taking someone out because you are scared, or being dishonest because its you vs them, this is not playing by the rules, imo.
I think we're probably in agreement, but I don't agree with your characterization of my thinking OR for including me in those people you think have been conditioned to the way of thinking you describe.
The idea that being passive in the face of agression is noble is all over the place. It's deep in our culture. It's cooked in.
What happens to a kid in school that defends himself from a bully? Is he a hero? Nope. Is he praised and supported? Nope. Why? Because passivity is valued.
We regularly see self defense criminalized.
That's why they've killed millions of us over the last century, and gotten away with it. We won't oppose then in a way they respect. That's part of why they hate us and see us as sheep and cattle. We act like it. And we've let THEM train us how to think and act.
When I point this out, people object, even though it's right in front of them daily.