Blacks (of which I am not) in the early 1900's had the lowest divorce rates, safest communities, had successful doctors and shop owners and schools, while segregated, had a higher literacy rate than that of its white counterpart. Blacks had a higher church attendance rate also. After all what do you expect lead them through slavery and into and through lynching mobs of the early 1900's if it wasn't there faith in the Lord.
Not to take away anything from heroic whites who were also lynched alongside them as they attempted to help their fellow human beings. Heroic whites who were lynched in equal numbers to blacks at the time.
This is NOT a knock on whites or any other for that matter, but an example of where MAG768720's arguments and false assumptions fail miserably.
These FACTS fly in the face of any assertion that genetic make-up contributes to propensity to commit crime.
If one were armed with this data than one could only conclude that. Genetics plays no role in propensity to commit crime or any conclusion of inferiority. One is ONLY left to continue to ask the 'why?'.
Hey MAG768720, I'll throw you a bone. A better question to ask is "If the above mentioned statistics are true, WHEN and WHAT changed in the black community?"
In and when that changed, what was the underlying goal? And WHO changed it? WHY did they push that change? To what end?
What I think you'll find is a concerted effort to destroy the black community.
You are also ignoring POST SLAVERY!
Blacks had the lowest divorce rate amoung ethnic groups. There was not a gang bang / thug criminal culture amoung blacks in the 30s / 40s.
My mom and dad are black born in 1950.
Even to them. This black thug culture is FOREIGN to them. There was no drive by shootings with blacks in the 1930s, etc.
The violent history of blacks has always been a roller caster ride of data points.
It's been an up and down thing.
Never has it been a violent bunch of thugs just killing people randomly.
The only black history that white conservative / liberals know is this dysfunctional trash history.
Why don't they teach you about Booker T Washington???
Why do they not teach more about Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams??
Once again perfectly said.
Thomas Sowell - History will prove this man an American Treasure.
Blacks (of which I am not) in the early 1900's had the lowest divorce rates, safest communities, had successful doctors and shop owners and schools, while segregated, had a higher literacy rate than that of its white counterpart. Blacks had a higher church attendance rate also. After all what do you expect lead them through slavery and into and through lynching mobs of the early 1900's if it wasn't there faith in the Lord.
Not to take away anything from heroic whites who were also lynched alongside them as they attempted to help their fellow human beings. Heroic whites who were lynched in equal numbers to blacks at the time.
This is NOT a knock on whites or any other for that matter, but an example of where MAG768720's arguments and false assumptions fail miserably.
These FACTS fly in the face of any assertion that genetic make-up contributes to propensity to commit crime.
If one were armed with this data than one could only conclude that. Genetics plays no role in propensity to commit crime or any conclusion of inferiority. One is ONLY left to continue to ask the 'why?'.
Hey MAG768720, I'll throw you a bone. A better question to ask is "If the above mentioned statistics are true, WHEN and WHAT changed in the black community?"
In and when that changed, what was the underlying goal? And WHO changed it? WHY did they push that change? To what end?
What I think you'll find is a concerted effort to destroy the black community.
Well said!
People like MAG768720 tend to base their ideas on their personal observations of what they see.
These observations will always be short sided. They do not compare time periods to establish a timeline.