The Super Bowl Was Named After The Super Ball (Or So The Story Goes)
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
You've been great with a lot of these, but this one...I don't see what it has to do with anything Q-related.
A team had some great successes over 50 years apart. The Chiefs also won Super Bowl IV in 1970. Big whoop.
I disagree.
A)
5 Q posts reference the Super Bowl:
https://qalerts.app/?q=super+bowl
Clearly there was something significant about it and it was more than just the "puppy" stuff. Q post even asks about the "winners" of the Super Bowl.
B) Co-Founder of Nigeria's biggest bank died in a helicopter "crash" on his way to the 2024 Super Bowl. Lots of influential people gather there.
C) We just saw Super 2024 (Kansas City Chiefs beat the 49ers) play a rerun of the 2020 Super Bowl (Kansas City Chiefs beat the 49ers).
Same team. Same coaches. Same Quarterback (Mahomes from Whitehouse). The only thing that changed was the location of the stadium from FL (Hard Rock) to NV (Allegiant) and the score changed.
The Kansas City Chiefs also happen to be the very first team that ever played in the Superbowl. They seem very tied to its origin.
It's an amazing coincidence that we get the SAME SUPERBOWL that we got just before the 2020 Presidential election, don't you think?
Whatever the Super Bowl was really built for and whatever it does seems very important and very relevant.
Its so weird. Makes my mind go to esoteric things like timelines converging or simulation theory. What is to be gained by engineering two specific teams into a Super Bowl? Far less complicated ways to send communications or symbols, I would think. Anyone that needs to be at the event can be there, regardless of team. What, if anything, are they trying to accomplish? Stuff like this makes me think there is far more to how this reality operates than we know. I hope at some point we can stop chasing our tails around in this brutal realm.
It's accomplishing their will to dominate the masses. To overcome to sovereignty of God is what they are after specifically in dominating humanity. They want our worship.
Why use H-wood, movies, TV shows, sports, and sports figures? Because these are ways to influence the masses. Q even talked about they wanted people to follow the stars. These are ways to set up "signs" for the masses and send indirect comms to cells.
I have already heard many lefties talking how they worry the Super Bowl winner predicts who the president will be. Yes, several lefties believe the "universe" talks to them like this.
Their logic: comms are a batshit crazy idea.
Also their logic: The Universe sends my messages about the future through sports.
I think the influencing the masses to good decisions or to bad are what both sides fight over. The Super Bowl is a massive event that draws a huge amount of eyeballs. Of course it'd be veery useful to engineer it. Anything that draws hundreds of millions of eyeballs is a very important source of influence over the masses.
Taylor Swift's main job was bringing MORE eyeballs to it.
I think all of that is clear. My mind just wants to know the details. What SPECIFICALLY is the reason it would be KC versus San Fran? What do those specific teams being in it entail or present to the public or communicate to their minions? If something had gone awry, and it was KC-Detroit or San Fran-Baltimore, would the world we are experiencing now be different?
Love seeing this bit of skepticism and that it led to Semper digging deeper and fleshing out its significance.
It's a bit sad, but for the normies, discovering that sportsball is rigged could be the biggest wakeup call of all.
https://www.outkick.com/nfl/current-former-players-follow-arian-fosters-lead-make-hilarious-jokes-about-dumb-nfl-is-scripted-narrative
I don't believe the league is scripted in a complete sense, but rather that certain key players, coaches, and refs are told to lean the game a certain way or focus on a certain player.
Imagine it like this. If even a single person at your workplace was on the take from an outside entity, what level of disruption could they cause? Down systems? Damaged inventory? OSHA coming in?
It doesn't take everyone being involved to swing a game, just a few.
Too much stuff, too little space in a post...
On your points about it only takes a few, I agree 100%. A bad coach doling out penalties like candy can get do a lot of damage. Add in a player on the take who keeps "causing" penalties and the team gets bumped back several yards. A player not making his tackles or a coach making bad calls.
It doesn't take many to make sure a team won't win even if 99% of the players are sincerely playing their hearts out.