‘Stack the Deck So Trump Wins’ – Leftists Melt Down Over Judge Cannon’s Jury Instructions in Jack Smith’s Classified Docs Case
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
- SALT -
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Seriously, and I mean this with all due disrespect- fuck them. Their puppet-in-residence stole documents for years, and NOW they want to play the senility card to get that fucking crook off the hook?!? Those faggots could have a fatal aneurysm for all I care, due to Cannon's jury instructions.
Exactly, and jack Smith has not shown cause for a trial other then lawfare. This is not DC.
“Cannon seems inclined to push the case to trial but is basically asking if she can stack the deck so Trump wins,”
She's not "asking", she's giving them two options. Pay attention.
Jack has not really made his case to the court. Yes she wants it to go to trial, but requires the prosecution to show cause for a trial. He never had a case.
For months now they have completely ignored the fact that Jack Smith never had a case. Let em cry me a river.
Amen.
And yet the talking heads will all stay in lock step with Engoron's decision to fine Trump $454M. Why don't they have any compassion for Trump on an obscene fine? I guess they never heard of the 8th Amendment to the Constitution.
Apparently rich people don't deserve compassion.
I doubt they have any kowledge of anything in the Constitution.
HERE HERE 🔔 Ruth Bader Ginsberg on Trump's excessive fine and previous unanimous Court decisions.
https://www.dailynews.com/2024/02/24/rbg-warned-against-trumps-massive-fine/
Jordan Rubin said Cannon is “apparently contemplating instructions that could effectively win Trump’s case for him…”
“The problem is that Cannon is apparently contemplating instructions that could effectively win Trump’s case for him, regardless of how strong the evidence against him is. To understand why, recall that the judge’s latest move comes against the backdrop of Trump’s claim that, under the Presidential Records Act, he could have deemed whatever sensitive government records he wanted to as “personal” and then taken them with him from the White House, precluding the government from prosecuting him over the retention. It’s a nonsensical position that Cannon could have rejected outright, but she chose to hold a hearing on it last week.” Jordan Rubin wrote
Oops! A goose and gander declaration!
They think it is ok for the goose and not the gander. Thank you for sharing this. Had not heard that expression in a long time.
Permitting voters to have a choice isn’t stacking the deck. Disqualifying him is.
Exactly.