What makes you say it had nukes on it? I get that these weapons exist and are put into containers, what info do we have about the shipp carrying those? Can't find anything else on it.
Because it didn't. This is some totally retarded idea to think that a ship carrying nukes wouldn't be boarded by spec ops and taken over but instead some really smart whitehats remotely took control and rammed a major transportation artery bridge to stop it. Some of these people in here have a very low IQ
I think your conclusion is right, but if you don't think destroying a major transportation artery is worth averting a nuclear war with a great power country, I don't know what to tell you.
I don't think I agree with your assessment of low IQ ... or maybe I do?
What makes you say it had nukes on it? I get that these weapons exist and are put into containers, what info do we have about the shipp carrying those? Can't find anything else on it.
Because it didn't. This is some totally retarded idea to think that a ship carrying nukes wouldn't be boarded by spec ops and taken over but instead some really smart whitehats remotely took control and rammed a major transportation artery bridge to stop it. Some of these people in here have a very low IQ
I think your conclusion is right, but if you don't think destroying a major transportation artery is worth averting a nuclear war with a great power country, I don't know what to tell you.
I don't think I agree with your assessment of low IQ ... or maybe I do?
It could just as easily have been retribution for an infrastructure attack like Nordstream.
Way too many possibilities to determine anything for sure now.
The anon was speculating.
throwing this out there, what if they didn't scuttle the ship, but used an unrelated ship to shut down the port?
You can't just "hey guys we need you to shut down this port for 4 months for inspections"
If the bridge collapses and the port shuts down, what are you going to do?
MOVES and counterMOVES.