I should have posted this here sooner but better late than never. Back in the mid 2000's, I was in paramedic school. A local paramedic came to our class and spoke about a training program that offered many different classes depending on what we were interested in. The whole thing is put on, and paid for by the Department of Homeland Security. Specifically, the Center for Domestic Preparedness. The training option I chose as Technical Emergency Response Training (TERT) You know, the government loves their acronyms. It was a 4 day course at a huge facility in Anniston, AL. It was an old army base in the mountains. It took a day to travel (again, all paid for by the government), 4 days of training, and another day to return home. We had to apply by filling out an insane amount of paperwork, send that paperwork to our local Homeland Sec official, they had to sign off on it and they sent it on to be processed. It seemed to take months if memory serves me correctly. No one from my class of about 20 bothered applying because their normal jobs wouldn't give them that much time off. Fortunately, I worked for a great employer who did give me the time off. We got our airline tickets in the mail, along with a ton of other stuff. Upon arrival at the airport, I met 2 security guys from a local hospital that I was doing clinical rotations at for my paramedic license. We all got to the airport in Atlanta, and there were like 3 or 4 buses full of people from all over the US. We then drove to the Army Base. Upon our arrival, 2 guys got on each bus. One was a guy who was professionally dressed with tags hanging around his neck, along with a guy in full fatigues and an M4. They checked everyone's IDs before we were allowed to step off the busses. As I was getting off the bus, I noticed this crazy building that looked like an oil refinery. There were different sized pipes and vents going in every direction. I thought to myself, "WTF is that place?' We were then led to a building that was more or less a building with classrooms, but this was sort of a lecture room with a huge screen. They went over what to expect over the next 4 days, gave us our IDs for the facility and our room keys. We were 2 to a room, which were basically dorms. Before dinner, we were told to report to a building and our blood was drawn. Everyone thought it was a bit odd. I don't recall this fact being spoken about in the application paperwork, but it may have been. We then had some amazing food. The next day, classes started. We had class all day and some of it was hands on type things learning how to use the equipment we would need in the final exercise. I'm from the OKC area so the bombing got brought up in one of our classes. Numerous scenarios were floated which this clown from the FBI immediately shot down. I wish I'd known then what I know now. But it's probably good I didn't. We learned how to use geiger counters, and many other devices to test everything you could imagine. Well, things one could test in the field, but not lab testing. We went over different classes of PPE and how to DON and DOFF them. We had to do mask fit tests which I didn't understand until later. The last full day we ran a full-blown exercise that took all day and involved everyone. What was the scenario you may ask? A train derailment that involved the disbursement of Phosgene gas, Chlorine, and Carbon tetrachloride. Basically, freon 10, which was banned in roughly 2000. But in this scenario, it was being transported to a disposal facility. If this scenario sounds familiar, I can send you the training manual, which they let us take home, and you can compare it to the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio. They are identical. Hold onto your hat, because it gets even more crazy. We ran the whole scenario, which most of which was done outside, but some of it had to be done in a huge building that was set up as though it were outside. This is where we had to do out "testing". At this point, all of us, including the instructors were in hazmat suits with SCBA and taped up gloves and boots. No outside air in or out. Once we were done with that part of the scenario, we had to go through a complete decon and very careful removal of our gear. During the testing phase the instructors kept asking everyone if they had headaches and kept checking our eyes to see if anyone had pinpoint pupils. I'm sure you understand that this is an indicator of exposure to a nerve agent. The whole thing comes to an end, everyone gets out of their gear and back from their different areas as the whole thing was a round-robin type of event, and we gather back in one of the huge classrooms for a debrief. We are all chatting and the instructors all come in and tell us that everyone did well and there were no issues. They then told us that we were all exposed to VX gas!! Which is why they were asking about headaches and checking our eyes. Now whether or not they actually DID expose us to that is anyone's guess, as they could have just told us that, but I wouldn't be surprised if they did. They said it was to get us to trust our gear and training. Then, on the day we all left, at like 5 am, we had to get our blood drawn again. I can't believe I'm just now thinking about all of this. But it's been a number of years. I'm sure there's a bunch of things I left out that I'll think of later. But those are the things that stuck in my memory that I thought everyone would find interesting. Apparently, this training looks good on a resume because I put it on mine when applying to a local fire department and during the interview I was questioned about it pretty hard. It seems the guy questioning me applied to go and was denied. He was pissed that I got to go and he didn't. I checked the Homeland Sec, site and the CDP and they still offer something similar and a number of other classes at the same place. They had these classes year-round so just imagine the number of people's blood they got over the past 20+ years, if not longer. And oddly enough, I ran across the list of contact info for all the participants that I was in class with. The one guy that stuck out to me was the guy I was with. Older gentleman who was the head fire/ems investigator for DC. I may try contacting him just to see how he is doing.
Consider how many first responders blood samples they have just from this "training" alone. I'm hoping the link I'm putting here works for everyone. I'd love to talk to someone who has been to this training in the past 5 or so years to see what type of final scenario they are using now.
I read the whole thing. Good write up and very interdasting.
For the love of cheetos, paragraphs are your friend, dude!!
pls do a TL; DR lol
Ohhh that’s all just a coincidence!!! How could they make it happen in real life???
Sounds like a great training experience. Being a fire fighter I had an opportunity to attend a crude by rail training a bunch of years ago. Scenarios of crude oil train crash and how to manage/mitigate leaks and fire. Was intense just as you described the one you attended. But not quite as deep with class A Hazmat PPE, etc.
Thanks for sharing!!
can you upload them to https://catbox.moe and drop the links? having trouble with MEGA
conspircacies.win is bleeding over here again.
Look, seeing your anecdotal write-up, and this being stickied as some sort of proof bothers me. I'll ask some devil's advocate questions.
You say "It's exactly like East Palestine, OH". In what way? That it's a train derailment with hazardous chemicals? If it stops there then - well yeah... That's probably a thing to train for. Most hazardous materials are sent by rail, rather than truck to keep them off of public roads in case of accident.
So prepping for a train derailment is certainly a core competency I would expect from an agency tasked with mitigating emergencies.
But to further delve into the conspiracy part - the 'this was no accident' meme that floats around GAW. Why train someone to mitigate and prepare for a disaster your planning? What does that accomplish?
🤡😆
Yeah you make a great point 🙄
Narrative seeding and predictive programming.
You should ask the Uvalde police who had just trained for a school shooting prior to a government funded school shooting, in which they broke the protocols they were taught in the training. How does that make sense?
At this point in reality accidents should be considered terrorism and sabotage until proven the opposite.
Cowards. They were cowards.
What amount of proof would you be looking for. This seems to be an extremely high barrier.
Not necessarily a high barrier, just a simple process of deduction. Every situation is the same at this point.
The first proof is the way the agencies and coordinated mockingbird media immediately try and shape the narrative without a logical amount of time an honest investigator would need in gathering the evidence necessary to determine the cause and the variables involved.
The second proof is after a few days when evidence contradicts the original narrative presented, they steam roll forward with a nothing to see here, no evidence case closed attitude and become belligerent when questioned about alternative theories or causes such as terrorism or malicious intent, even though evidence points in that direction.
The third proof would be to ask if it aligns with the great reset and the war plans that have already been laid out, or whether the outcome serves the purposes of a greater motive or objective that is already in the process, such as a smart city already in the development and bureaucratic process.
The fourth proof would be circumstantial evidence such as background information of those involved and any possible connections or history.
Is it possible to narrow down all the answers? No, but enough circumstantial evidence can convict a murderer and even though they try and obfuscate these events most of us can see them for what they are, based on knowing the intended goals of our enemies.
Does it make a difference? Every once in a while people see the glitch when you show them, but usually it only further convicts my own determination and motivation to continue down the road I’ve already chosen.
So how did/do you apply these 4 proofs to
Are they articulable? It's obvious you have put a lot of thought into the four areas you look at, and for some I can agree, but for others, they seem to be open to a ton of interpretation, and a bit of circular logic.
East Palestine highlights -predictive programming in a movie called white noise, with far too many coincidences -digital medical bracelet rollout specifically in East Palestine, immediately prior to accident that would monitor your health and help first responders in case of an emergency (Possible corporations seeking to benefit and collect data off of a pre planned event?) -fact checking mocking birds come out of the wood work to say it’s all conspiracy theory -epa locks out the locals from their meetings and keeps them in the dark -cleanup crews don’t talk to locals and act/work in a very secretive manner -reports about how the railway handled the warnings of the breaks that were on fire and the suspicion around a missing safety sensor box that was replaced shortly after.
This is just off the top of my head I’m sure more could be added.
Fact remains the same. Americans in East Palestine, their water, their food, their children, their health and their future were all severely compromised and a lot of them I would suspect will suffer from what they were exposed from if not outright die from cancer or other ailments from the exposure.
-How’s the water in Flint doing?
-Is there a genocide taking place right now?
-Is cancer a weapon?
-Is food and water a weapon?
-Can the air be weaponized?
-Is sabotage an extremely useful tool in war?
Does our government have a history of contaminating and exposing American populations to experiments to cause intentional harm in order to study the effects and results?
Do they work hand in hand with corporations who benefit off of those experiments? Is there a history of it?