25
posted ago by RandomNumber ago by RandomNumber +25 / -0

#Another Outlandish Overreach by the CDC https://www.theepochtimes.com/opinion/another-outlandish-overreach-by-the-cdc-5619202?ea_src=au-frontpage&ea_med=opinion-6 via https://dissectleft.blogspot.com/2024/04/doctors-force-fda-to-remove-false.html

...As it turns out, the CDC had quite a large role in guiding election processes. ... The theory was that people gathering in a polling place would be a super-spreader event. What science did they cite to demonstrate this? None at all. So far as I know, and I’ve looked far and wide, there is not a single study anywhere that purports to show some relationship between disease spread and in-person voting. The CDC just made that up. ...

...There is simply no way that the CDC could not have known about the uncertainties and vagaries created by absentee ballots. They are banned by half the countries in the world for that reason. ...

...The crucial point here is that the CDC massively overstepped the bounds of its mandate by intervening in the processes by which Americans select its leaders, strongly pushing a method that was a known source of fraud. Nor has the CDC ever been held to account for this, not to my knowledge in any case. ...

...Speaking of which, who actually did this and why? Aren’t these interesting questions? Why is no one asking them? Where are the investigations? Where is the outrage?

I had not heard that mail-in ballots were pushed by the CDC. Like the article says, this is tremendous overreach. And like the article says, I've heard no follow ups on that subject.