I stickied this. This is factual. It's an experiment. It's conducted by globalist retards who should be hung by the neck until dead. Is it real? Yip. But is it happening on a large enough global scale to result in "muh toxic spraying" over the houses of 300 chemtards on five continents? Nope.
what's the source of your excessive confidence that chemtrails aren't real and in large enough quantities to be problematic? neither one of us knows either way which is why we should simply keep an open mind that either theory could be spot on
The "excessive confidence" is clearly on your side, not mine. The source is that it is not my responsibility to prove the negative, to prove that something alleged by you (or, presumably, any other random mental midget) is not happening. Learn how the rules of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion works
You literally have three posts in the last nine months. What an arrogant username you have.
It’s not your responsibility to prove the negative, certainly not, but where does your innate urge to insult the persons who disagree with you come into play?
Which part of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion is this?
I'm not trying to act like an asshole here but honestly, I wonder what planet I am on sometimes. Socrates was literally the inventor of the Socratic method, in terms of Western society he was basically the father of critical thinking. Being asked to prove that they are not spraying isn't framework that's even definable? Let's try it. Define what you would accept as proof that they are not spraying. Like what do I prove, the absence of spraying equipment secretly installed in 45,000 commercial aircraft around the world? It's absurd in the face of it and how are we Even having this conversation....
not sure how you interpret me to be arrogant by my username.
that seems awfully shortsighted clearly having no clue of its genesis. Socrates himself is said to have been quoted stating, and I paraphrase as does the internet in any instance I've found of him be attributed to the general quote, "I now know I'm intelligent because I realize I know nothing".
apologies are always welcomed.
all the covid jab pushers also held the opinion that there was no "proof" in 2020 and 2021 that the jabs were bad and there were no grounds to claim the pharmas were bad and would ever knowingly harm the public...and that people claiming this were mental midgets
I try to live these days by Socrates philosophy and recognize that I/we can't truly know anything. our understanding of everything is, or should be, on a scale of a level of confidence and we should always remain open to our strong opinions being turned on their head, imho
… there is so much wrong with this statement, even simply from the “research” only standpoint that you are taking, there’s no way you don’t see this no?
“Yeah so that thing conspiracy theories are claiming is happening, it’s not happening, but here’s an example where it did happen, and they didn’t tell us, but it’s just research, well more so a live experiment at that point, but still totally not happening and certainly not wide scale!”
“Are they conducting experiments? Yup. Are the hiding it to keep naysayers from knowing? Yup. Have they ever done this before, on a larger scale, or even just many times before which would result in large scale useage anyways? NOPE U STUPID QHEM-TARDS!”
I honestly don’t even care anymore about the chemtrail thing here, but just for the sake of obiding by your rules set out, I’ll lay it out one last time.
CHEMTRAILS - Is it a verified Q Research topic?
YUUP!
Did Q mention General Flynn 59 seperate times? YUP!
Did General Flynn Tweet out “FAIR WARNING” with a link to an Anon video which, in the first few seconds shows us a commercial style jet liner leaving a white trail of smoke
With the narrator explicitly stating “The NANOTECH is in everything…. Manipulated by 5G…. THEY SPRAY IT IN THE AIR!” …. YIP!
So by standards of this board, does this not mean something Flynn states can and should be debated researched and discussed?
Honestly I give no cares about the rule anymore like I said, never allow another chemtrail thread again for all I care.
It’s the attacking, insulting, degrading language used against the ones that do, and then you state as a FACT it can’t and isn’t happening. As the media does what they always do and mocks us with it right in your face with a sly wink “Yeah but we aren’t doing it! It’s just research!”
This doesn’t leave me feeling insulted or degraded though, it just leaves me with a feeling of something being “off”. To see such a nonchalant and insulting attitude to those of us on the board who have followed the topic passionately, before Q even, and consider it one of the TOP priorities for restoring any semblance of normalcy in this matrix.
This isn't about geoengineering. The point of me stickying this was to try and get someone to even define what they think is happening here.
those of us on the board who have followed the topic passionately
AWESOME, OK, I have someone. Let's FG.
First, can we even define what chemtrails even is? Who's doing it? Random Bill Gates projects with specialized planes with no passengers on board? We need someone to explain exactly the program results in six chemtrails over the houses of 200+ chemtards / day on five continents. I'm being dead serious. Explain this.
This is literally the "chemtrails" theory. Am I wrong? So why can't anyone explain this? I'm assured that the trails start and stop? If so, explain the mechanism that accomplishes this on commercial aircraft?
I worked at in airline for almost five years. Explain the logistics of this. A 737 lands in Calgary and goes directly to the gate. I'm an airport nerd, I'm sitting there for HOURS before my flight (it's not uncommon for me to sit for three or four hours just enjoying the activity). The aircraft ONLY gets refuelled, no other "below wing" activities happen other than a ground check and baggage being loaded. Where's the chemicals coming from all the time? Off the plane goes to Vancouver, and, along the way, it's making what you guys call "chemtrails". OK, FINE... How?
You say the poison is in the fuel. It's aluminum. Do you guys even know how jet engines work? Holy cow, aluminum in the fuel is not new. It makes aluminum oxide. Aluminum oxide is biologically non-toxic and inert. That's your poison? It's not highly reactive and doesn't easily decompose to release or otherwise bond with ambient harmful substances. That's chemistry talking. Basic research. Why am I getting looked at like I have two fucking heads, here?
Occam's Razor—which, BTW, isn't "the simplest explanation is true" it states that the explanation with the fewest UNSUPPORTED assumptions is true.
We don't need "people spotting" the differences in the skies. We need people learning how the new jet engines work and how incredibly more efficient they burn fuel. We need a reproduceable and rigorous scientific method to prove this and as usually that's nobody but me is saying this
Mainly because they were focused on not wasting their time on things that are not happening and instead focused on where the real poison is... Pharmaceuticals, vaccines, food
I stickied this. This is factual. It's an experiment. It's conducted by globalist retards who should be hung by the neck until dead. Is it real? Yip. But is it happening on a large enough global scale to result in "muh toxic spraying" over the houses of 300 chemtards on five continents? Nope.
what's the source of your excessive confidence that chemtrails aren't real and in large enough quantities to be problematic? neither one of us knows either way which is why we should simply keep an open mind that either theory could be spot on
The "excessive confidence" is clearly on your side, not mine. The source is that it is not my responsibility to prove the negative, to prove that something alleged by you (or, presumably, any other random mental midget) is not happening. Learn how the rules of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion works
You literally have three posts in the last nine months. What an arrogant username you have.
It’s not your responsibility to prove the negative, certainly not, but where does your innate urge to insult the persons who disagree with you come into play?
Which part of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion is this?
I'm not trying to act like an asshole here but honestly, I wonder what planet I am on sometimes. Socrates was literally the inventor of the Socratic method, in terms of Western society he was basically the father of critical thinking. Being asked to prove that they are not spraying isn't framework that's even definable? Let's try it. Define what you would accept as proof that they are not spraying. Like what do I prove, the absence of spraying equipment secretly installed in 45,000 commercial aircraft around the world? It's absurd in the face of it and how are we Even having this conversation....
not sure how you interpret me to be arrogant by my username. that seems awfully shortsighted clearly having no clue of its genesis. Socrates himself is said to have been quoted stating, and I paraphrase as does the internet in any instance I've found of him be attributed to the general quote, "I now know I'm intelligent because I realize I know nothing".
apologies are always welcomed.
all the covid jab pushers also held the opinion that there was no "proof" in 2020 and 2021 that the jabs were bad and there were no grounds to claim the pharmas were bad and would ever knowingly harm the public...and that people claiming this were mental midgets
I try to live these days by Socrates philosophy and recognize that I/we can't truly know anything. our understanding of everything is, or should be, on a scale of a level of confidence and we should always remain open to our strong opinions being turned on their head, imho
I'll go off to being a mental midget now
Help me out now
https://greatawakening.win/p/17siXQ9JJP/x/c/4ZA2HGGNyBJ
… there is so much wrong with this statement, even simply from the “research” only standpoint that you are taking, there’s no way you don’t see this no?
“Yeah so that thing conspiracy theories are claiming is happening, it’s not happening, but here’s an example where it did happen, and they didn’t tell us, but it’s just research, well more so a live experiment at that point, but still totally not happening and certainly not wide scale!”
“Are they conducting experiments? Yup. Are the hiding it to keep naysayers from knowing? Yup. Have they ever done this before, on a larger scale, or even just many times before which would result in large scale useage anyways? NOPE U STUPID QHEM-TARDS!”
I honestly don’t even care anymore about the chemtrail thing here, but just for the sake of obiding by your rules set out, I’ll lay it out one last time.
CHEMTRAILS - Is it a verified Q Research topic?
YUUP!
Did Q mention General Flynn 59 seperate times? YUP!
Did General Flynn Tweet out “FAIR WARNING” with a link to an Anon video which, in the first few seconds shows us a commercial style jet liner leaving a white trail of smoke
With the narrator explicitly stating “The NANOTECH is in everything…. Manipulated by 5G…. THEY SPRAY IT IN THE AIR!” …. YIP!
https://greatawakening.win/p/16an0knRg7/gen-flynn--fair-warning---anythi/c/
So by standards of this board, does this not mean something Flynn states can and should be debated researched and discussed?
Honestly I give no cares about the rule anymore like I said, never allow another chemtrail thread again for all I care.
It’s the attacking, insulting, degrading language used against the ones that do, and then you state as a FACT it can’t and isn’t happening. As the media does what they always do and mocks us with it right in your face with a sly wink “Yeah but we aren’t doing it! It’s just research!”
This doesn’t leave me feeling insulted or degraded though, it just leaves me with a feeling of something being “off”. To see such a nonchalant and insulting attitude to those of us on the board who have followed the topic passionately, before Q even, and consider it one of the TOP priorities for restoring any semblance of normalcy in this matrix.
QHEM-TARDS UNITE!
Plz don’t ban me Mr. Sir.. /end rant
Thank you. You said it better than I ever could.
This isn't about geoengineering. The point of me stickying this was to try and get someone to even define what they think is happening here.
AWESOME, OK, I have someone. Let's FG.
First, can we even define what chemtrails even is? Who's doing it? Random Bill Gates projects with specialized planes with no passengers on board? We need someone to explain exactly the program results in six chemtrails over the houses of 200+ chemtards / day on five continents. I'm being dead serious. Explain this.
This is literally the "chemtrails" theory. Am I wrong? So why can't anyone explain this? I'm assured that the trails start and stop? If so, explain the mechanism that accomplishes this on commercial aircraft?
I worked at in airline for almost five years. Explain the logistics of this. A 737 lands in Calgary and goes directly to the gate. I'm an airport nerd, I'm sitting there for HOURS before my flight (it's not uncommon for me to sit for three or four hours just enjoying the activity). The aircraft ONLY gets refuelled, no other "below wing" activities happen other than a ground check and baggage being loaded. Where's the chemicals coming from all the time? Off the plane goes to Vancouver, and, along the way, it's making what you guys call "chemtrails". OK, FINE... How?
You say the poison is in the fuel. It's aluminum. Do you guys even know how jet engines work? Holy cow, aluminum in the fuel is not new. It makes aluminum oxide. Aluminum oxide is biologically non-toxic and inert. That's your poison? It's not highly reactive and doesn't easily decompose to release or otherwise bond with ambient harmful substances. That's chemistry talking. Basic research. Why am I getting looked at like I have two fucking heads, here?
Occam's Razor—which, BTW, isn't "the simplest explanation is true" it states that the explanation with the fewest UNSUPPORTED assumptions is true.
We don't need "people spotting" the differences in the skies. We need people learning how the new jet engines work and how incredibly more efficient they burn fuel. We need a reproduceable and rigorous scientific method to prove this and as usually that's nobody but me is saying this
What I have an issue with is, why didn't WHs end the supposed chemtrails.
And why is the Air Force not responding... or are they complicit?
Mainly because they were focused on not wasting their time on things that are not happening and instead focused on where the real poison is... Pharmaceuticals, vaccines, food
I would pay attention to that
I agree.
Talking about real problems versus fear porn is a fine line. This is why we must use discernment.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YMBlS4mL08Wv/