It’s not your responsibility to prove the negative, certainly not, but where does your innate urge to insult the persons who disagree with you come into play?
Which part of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion is this?
I'm not trying to act like an asshole here but honestly, I wonder what planet I am on sometimes. Socrates was literally the inventor of the Socratic method, in terms of Western society he was basically the father of critical thinking. Being asked to prove that they are not spraying isn't framework that's even definable? Let's try it. Define what you would accept as proof that they are not spraying. Like what do I prove, the absence of spraying equipment secretly installed in 45,000 commercial aircraft around the world? It's absurd in the face of it and how are we Even having this conversation....
it isn't too hard to develop a "jet fuel" that results in chemtrails. I'm not suggesting all or even most or maybe even any of the chemtrails are the result of some separate tank and spray system in planes but instead the result of intentionally developed fuel mixtures very likely unbeknownst to some or even most of the distributors.
my other offering is that I've literally watched the sky on may a day (I'm a golfer and find myself outside for long stretches) begin with the neat thin line "contrails" of a jet only to see those contrails result in a large cloud/plume in the sky an hour or 2 later knowing full well it's exactly that exhaust being the cause because I've watched it each step of the way on a perfectly clear day.
also, there are high level military brass that have spoken out about this that the powers to be have attempted to silence.
I'd offer/admit I don't "know" these chemtrails exist with a deliberate depopulation or other nefarious purpose but I'd give it the over by quite a bit after my research. I'd also admit that this isn't our biggest fight with all that's going on but rather a piece of the puzzle to consider
It’s not your responsibility to prove the negative, certainly not, but where does your innate urge to insult the persons who disagree with you come into play?
Which part of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion is this?
I'm not trying to act like an asshole here but honestly, I wonder what planet I am on sometimes. Socrates was literally the inventor of the Socratic method, in terms of Western society he was basically the father of critical thinking. Being asked to prove that they are not spraying isn't framework that's even definable? Let's try it. Define what you would accept as proof that they are not spraying. Like what do I prove, the absence of spraying equipment secretly installed in 45,000 commercial aircraft around the world? It's absurd in the face of it and how are we Even having this conversation....
I'd ask we consider that all exhaust isn't from an ideal combustion. see Section 3.1 and Figure 2.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108289/
it isn't too hard to develop a "jet fuel" that results in chemtrails. I'm not suggesting all or even most or maybe even any of the chemtrails are the result of some separate tank and spray system in planes but instead the result of intentionally developed fuel mixtures very likely unbeknownst to some or even most of the distributors.
my other offering is that I've literally watched the sky on may a day (I'm a golfer and find myself outside for long stretches) begin with the neat thin line "contrails" of a jet only to see those contrails result in a large cloud/plume in the sky an hour or 2 later knowing full well it's exactly that exhaust being the cause because I've watched it each step of the way on a perfectly clear day.
also, there are high level military brass that have spoken out about this that the powers to be have attempted to silence.
I'd offer/admit I don't "know" these chemtrails exist with a deliberate depopulation or other nefarious purpose but I'd give it the over by quite a bit after my research. I'd also admit that this isn't our biggest fight with all that's going on but rather a piece of the puzzle to consider