I stickied this. This is factual. It's an experiment. It's conducted by globalist retards who should be hung by the neck until dead. Is it real? Yip. But is it happening on a large enough global scale to result in "muh toxic spraying" over the houses of 300 chemtards on five continents? Nope.
what's the source of your excessive confidence that chemtrails aren't real and in large enough quantities to be problematic? neither one of us knows either way which is why we should simply keep an open mind that either theory could be spot on
The "excessive confidence" is clearly on your side, not mine. The source is that it is not my responsibility to prove the negative, to prove that something alleged by you (or, presumably, any other random mental midget) is not happening. Learn how the rules of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion works
You literally have three posts in the last nine months. What an arrogant username you have.
It’s not your responsibility to prove the negative, certainly not, but where does your innate urge to insult the persons who disagree with you come into play?
Which part of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion is this?
I'm not trying to act like an asshole here but honestly, I wonder what planet I am on sometimes. Socrates was literally the inventor of the Socratic method, in terms of Western society he was basically the father of critical thinking. Being asked to prove that they are not spraying isn't framework that's even definable? Let's try it. Define what you would accept as proof that they are not spraying. Like what do I prove, the absence of spraying equipment secretly installed in 45,000 commercial aircraft around the world? It's absurd in the face of it and how are we Even having this conversation....
I stickied this. This is factual. It's an experiment. It's conducted by globalist retards who should be hung by the neck until dead. Is it real? Yip. But is it happening on a large enough global scale to result in "muh toxic spraying" over the houses of 300 chemtards on five continents? Nope.
what's the source of your excessive confidence that chemtrails aren't real and in large enough quantities to be problematic? neither one of us knows either way which is why we should simply keep an open mind that either theory could be spot on
The "excessive confidence" is clearly on your side, not mine. The source is that it is not my responsibility to prove the negative, to prove that something alleged by you (or, presumably, any other random mental midget) is not happening. Learn how the rules of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion works
You literally have three posts in the last nine months. What an arrogant username you have.
It’s not your responsibility to prove the negative, certainly not, but where does your innate urge to insult the persons who disagree with you come into play?
Which part of actual logic, rhetoric, and persuasion is this?
I'm not trying to act like an asshole here but honestly, I wonder what planet I am on sometimes. Socrates was literally the inventor of the Socratic method, in terms of Western society he was basically the father of critical thinking. Being asked to prove that they are not spraying isn't framework that's even definable? Let's try it. Define what you would accept as proof that they are not spraying. Like what do I prove, the absence of spraying equipment secretly installed in 45,000 commercial aircraft around the world? It's absurd in the face of it and how are we Even having this conversation....