Not one legal connected person who identified some change in the way they do legal processes?
Not one leftist fact checker slavering to disprove Q-tards?
I actually found only one mention of it, back in 2019 I think, from ABC News, and the reporter actually proposed the ones in DC were from Mueller.
Since that didn't turn out, there hasnt been one mention in the media.
I've seen literally thousands of posts, comments, and tweets and yet not one single human has a rational explanation.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
I've posed this question to otherwise based friends, but Q deniers or naysayers. They go radio silent when I ask the question. Sometimes they will say "the indictments are for us", but at this point, we would have known if they were rounding up conservatives en masse. Also, what happened to Huber's UT organization of 400+ AUSAs?
There needs to be a legitimate crime, I believe, for it to be us. What crime would 500k Trump supporters have been honestly engaged in so much so that we are a flight risk, need that many sealed indictments, and they need to be sat on for years. It is incongruous.
J6, the Hunter Biden laptop, Ashley Biden diary, and Donald Trump prosecutions show that no legitimate crime is needed because they will make one up however ludicrous and flimsy. They choose the prosecutors, judges, and juries and they blackmail/threaten anyone who resists. They also accelerate and publicize the process as part of their intimidation tactics to make an example of their targets, so it is indeed incongruous that they would sit on sealed indictments and keep them secret if we were the targets.
Exactly.
Questioning the 2020 election steal for one.
Started wayyyy before that, but that is a good point.
I agree. Just proffering alternative hypotheses.