goto archive.org and find the book called: European treaties bearing on the United States of America and its dependencies before 1648 written by Francis Davenport Gardner.
Lol, "a couple" - proceeds to list a half dozen considerations, each of which deserves a college lecture on its own.
True, though, all true and in context, would provide a more complete tapestry than the bumper-sticker maxims "taught" today. Looking at one short time period in one country in isolation is simply prep for internet and TV reality shows which are nothing but eye candy and blurbs without connection to anything else. It doesn't matter as much what the kids memorize, it matters how they research, evaluate, and assemble the data in context to arrive at a more complete composite of what really happened/ is happening.
Historical relevance and general plotline: Portugese missionaries/traders used a secret base at Macau (near present day Hong Kong) and Japanese mercenaries (Ronin) to run guns, infiltrate, and destabilize Japan in order to pit warlord against warlord in order to establish additional "missions" with the intent of installing a Catholic-controlled elite to control Japan while controlling all international trade routes and profiting handsomely. [missionaries appeared to be Jesuits, series starts around 1598 with some flashbacks to ~1568]
Neither side paid any attention to Pope Alexander's bulls.[7] Instead, they negotiated the 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas, which moved the line further west to a meridian 370 leagues west of the Portuguese Cape Verde Islands, now explicitly giving Portugal all newly discovered lands east of the line.[11]
During the age of discovery Portuguese sailors explored the coasts of Africa and Asia. The sailors later established posts at Goa in 1510, and conquered Malacca in 1511, driving the Sultan to the southern tip of the Malay Peninsula from where he kept making raids on the Portuguese. The Portuguese under Jorge Álvares landed at Lintin Island in the Pearl River Delta of China in 1513 with a hired junk sailing from Portuguese Malacca. They erected a stone marker at Lintin Island claiming it for the King of Portugal, Manuel I.
Sounds like the series is pretty accurate then, I know they’ve gone to great lengths to make sure everything is historically accurate. The show has been fantastic.
Better than the original mini-series from the 1980s that appeared to have been cut short. I went back and watched the older one, and it appeared to be very, very compressed into just four episodes. Original source material book is probably much richer than the shows, but I have not read it.
However, it gives a different view of the same events. What I notice is the Sun Tzu adagium to keep your plans dark and appear weak when you are strong are well shown.
Nonwoke movies only. It is an excellent medium to introduce history in a meaningful way when not being used to intentionally corrupt the culture with retardation.
I went down this rabbit hole while trying to understand how Brazil ended up as Portugese given the West/East split. Apparently, it should have been Spanish since it was West? Some interesting explanation on this that I have not had time to explore. Please reply to this if you know the history on that particular item.
I live in Newfoundland, which was far enough out in the Atlantic to be included with Brazil in the Portuguese allotment. Labrador was granted, along with the rest of the Americas, to Spain. the dividing line was drawn north-south, 370 leagues (1800 kilometres) west of the Cape Verde Islands.
Ah, very good, ty. I keep forgetting how far the eastern part of Brazil sticks out into the Atlantic Ocean. If you ignore what we know about the full scope of the continents and just focus on the "leading edge" of what would be found as one moves westward from Europe, this makes total sense from the explorer's perspective.
Apparently Brazil (furthest edge) was east of the established dividing line once you look at the map, and then that claim got extended a bit west later?
An additional interesting point of discussion historically is the following:
How did this West/East split for Spain/Portugal morph into the Dutch East India Company dominance, and then into the British West/East India Companies dominance, and then into Prussian/German dominance?
I kinda understand the rise of modern Prussia (British Empire proxy?), but some of the connections in between the split start and modern Prussia are lost on me for now.
Ty. “Iron kingdom : the rise and downfall of Prussia, 1600-1947”, published 2006 by a UK firm.
Interesting that the “end” is tagged at 1947. Prussiagate series implies that Prussia did not end in 1947, but a new chapter started with it moved to America via Operation Paperclip (an American flag was “paperclipped” on top of a Nazi core relocated).
Note that the CIA was founded in 1947 by a combination of British MI-6 operatives and Nazis SS operatives. An interestingly odd collaboration, imo.
Actually, it never ended, because The German Reich is still there, though in a diminutive state.
In 1945: The German Army surrendered. Adm. Dönitz was the head of state. He was arrested and jailed in 1946.
However, The book: "Control Authority" delineates that all consequences in international law have been reversed to exactly the state it was in at 31-12-1937.
An often overlooked but very important series of books.
Hence, as the 4+1 negotiations on the " unification" of the two TREUHANDS ( TRUSTS) called Federal Republic of Germany and German Democratic Republic made clear: all Germans are Reichsdeutscher, but no longer Landesburger, as the Gleichschaltung happened in 1934, eliminating this difference, creating one "Volksgemeinschaft" or society of people. And Germans are employees of the FRG. This means that the German Reich survived and still exists. And because of that, The Prussian State still exists.
It is often difficult to put all pieces of the puzzle together.
Interesting. Does this at least partially explain all of the globalist Nazis of the World Economic Forum frequenting Frankfurt, Germany (HQ of latest iteration of the Reich?), and their NGO operations just south in Switzerland, while keeping their Trusts, gold, and assets just across the Swiss border at independent sovereign state Lichtenstein that shares monetary union only with Switzerland with specific Lichtenstein exemptions from all UN, WHO, and other global organization policies?
I dunno. What I appreciate from what I have read, is the fact that the German Reich has no officers. So the war never ended, as no peace treaty has ever been made.
Witnessing the demonstrations in Berlin a couple of years back, right before the US embassy, the people there exclaimed: Friedensvertrag!
Their Placards called upon Trump for help.
When it comes to Franfurt: The ECB is located there. And ECB is extraterritoial.
For those inclined to expand on their knowledge:
goto archive.org and find the book called: European treaties bearing on the United States of America and its dependencies before 1648 written by Francis Davenport Gardner.
https://archive.org/details/europeantreatie00paulgoog
Especially, read carefully the right of the King of Portugal to keep enemies of the Church in perpetual slavery, lest reconciliation.
Yes, there were serious reasons why a small nation like Portugal wound up with so much wealth in this period.
Indeed.
There are a couple of items influencing this matter:
The latter is also donned in the chase for Silver. Think depleting China of Silver by the Opium, Silk, Tea routes.
Currently we have a generally globally protected trade route system, and local interference with that:
think oil, and supply chains through several straits and now the New Silk Road ( Agenda 2025 China)
Lol, "a couple" - proceeds to list a half dozen considerations, each of which deserves a college lecture on its own.
True, though, all true and in context, would provide a more complete tapestry than the bumper-sticker maxims "taught" today. Looking at one short time period in one country in isolation is simply prep for internet and TV reality shows which are nothing but eye candy and blurbs without connection to anything else. It doesn't matter as much what the kids memorize, it matters how they research, evaluate, and assemble the data in context to arrive at a more complete composite of what really happened/ is happening.
Historical relevance and general plotline: Portugese missionaries/traders used a secret base at Macau (near present day Hong Kong) and Japanese mercenaries (Ronin) to run guns, infiltrate, and destabilize Japan in order to pit warlord against warlord in order to establish additional "missions" with the intent of installing a Catholic-controlled elite to control Japan while controlling all international trade routes and profiting handsomely. [missionaries appeared to be Jesuits, series starts around 1598 with some flashbacks to ~1568]
Full series: https://moviesjoy.is/tv/shogun-106618z
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter_caetera
History of Macau: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Macau
Sounds like the series is pretty accurate then, I know they’ve gone to great lengths to make sure everything is historically accurate. The show has been fantastic.
Better than the original mini-series from the 1980s that appeared to have been cut short. I went back and watched the older one, and it appeared to be very, very compressed into just four episodes. Original source material book is probably much richer than the shows, but I have not read it.
This show deviates tremendously from the book.
However, it gives a different view of the same events. What I notice is the Sun Tzu adagium to keep your plans dark and appear weak when you are strong are well shown.
You are going to love the next couple episodes. Episode 8 insane Sun Tzu:
I've never seen the Richard Chamberlain series, but I've heard it's good. I'm tempted to read the book but I know it's very long.
It's terrible that anyone would have to rely on movies to learn any actual history. We covered that treaty in home school, Biblioplan curriculum.
Nonwoke movies only. It is an excellent medium to introduce history in a meaningful way when not being used to intentionally corrupt the culture with retardation.
I went down this rabbit hole while trying to understand how Brazil ended up as Portugese given the West/East split. Apparently, it should have been Spanish since it was West? Some interesting explanation on this that I have not had time to explore. Please reply to this if you know the history on that particular item.
I live in Newfoundland, which was far enough out in the Atlantic to be included with Brazil in the Portuguese allotment. Labrador was granted, along with the rest of the Americas, to Spain. the dividing line was drawn north-south, 370 leagues (1800 kilometres) west of the Cape Verde Islands.
https://www.heritage.nf.ca/articles/exploration/portuguese.php
Ah, very good, ty. I keep forgetting how far the eastern part of Brazil sticks out into the Atlantic Ocean. If you ignore what we know about the full scope of the continents and just focus on the "leading edge" of what would be found as one moves westward from Europe, this makes total sense from the explorer's perspective.
Apparently Brazil (furthest edge) was east of the established dividing line once you look at the map, and then that claim got extended a bit west later?
An additional interesting point of discussion historically is the following:
I kinda understand the rise of modern Prussia (British Empire proxy?), but some of the connections in between the split start and modern Prussia are lost on me for now.
Prussia was partly in and outside of the Holy Roman Empire, which had its worldy sovereign discarded in 1806 by Napoleon.
The Pontifex Maximus is still here ....
A book called: The Iron Kingdom is very enlightening. https://archive.org/details/ironkingdomrised00chri
Ty. “Iron kingdom : the rise and downfall of Prussia, 1600-1947”, published 2006 by a UK firm.
Interesting that the “end” is tagged at 1947. Prussiagate series implies that Prussia did not end in 1947, but a new chapter started with it moved to America via Operation Paperclip (an American flag was “paperclipped” on top of a Nazi core relocated).
Note that the CIA was founded in 1947 by a combination of British MI-6 operatives and Nazis SS operatives. An interestingly odd collaboration, imo.
Actually, it never ended, because The German Reich is still there, though in a diminutive state.
In 1945: The German Army surrendered. Adm. Dönitz was the head of state. He was arrested and jailed in 1946. However, The book: "Control Authority" delineates that all consequences in international law have been reversed to exactly the state it was in at 31-12-1937.
See here: https://www.loc.gov/item/61035888_Volume-I/
An often overlooked but very important series of books.
Hence, as the 4+1 negotiations on the " unification" of the two TREUHANDS ( TRUSTS) called Federal Republic of Germany and German Democratic Republic made clear: all Germans are Reichsdeutscher, but no longer Landesburger, as the Gleichschaltung happened in 1934, eliminating this difference, creating one "Volksgemeinschaft" or society of people. And Germans are employees of the FRG. This means that the German Reich survived and still exists. And because of that, The Prussian State still exists.
It is often difficult to put all pieces of the puzzle together.
Interesting. Does this at least partially explain all of the globalist Nazis of the World Economic Forum frequenting Frankfurt, Germany (HQ of latest iteration of the Reich?), and their NGO operations just south in Switzerland, while keeping their Trusts, gold, and assets just across the Swiss border at independent sovereign state Lichtenstein that shares monetary union only with Switzerland with specific Lichtenstein exemptions from all UN, WHO, and other global organization policies?
Talk about a viper's nest. I think we found it.
I dunno. What I appreciate from what I have read, is the fact that the German Reich has no officers. So the war never ended, as no peace treaty has ever been made.
Witnessing the demonstrations in Berlin a couple of years back, right before the US embassy, the people there exclaimed: Friedensvertrag!
Their Placards called upon Trump for help.
When it comes to Franfurt: The ECB is located there. And ECB is extraterritoial.