The article delivers no information on where or how McCarthy has been "orchestrating Trumps removal from the ballot". It only talks about Singer as having previously funded McCarthy and McCarthy retiring.
This isn't a defense of McCarthy, but simply pointing out that clickbait headlines gonna clickbait headline.
Currently, Singer is intensifying efforts to remove Trump’s name from the 2024 ballot, effectively preventing American voters from selecting him. Such a move would likely increase the chances of another victory for Joe Biden—or possibly a win for Kamala Harris if, by any chance, Biden doesn’t make it to November.
As for McCarthy, he ended up leaving the House of Representatives before his term expired, but it cannot go unstated that McCarthy was previously being funded by, you guessed it: Singer.
Reading the article, I give it a 5 out of 10. It includes some useful information, but is far more concerned with spinning their own narrative, opinion and interpretation than it is about providing you, the reading with factual information so that you can make you your own mind.
Especially the "Caught red handed" bullshit headline.
Whether its 'left' or 'right' beware of media - mainstream or alt, that are trying to program you and influence you to their way of thinking.
If Singer funds McCarthy, and we know what else Singer has been involved in, and we also know from Matt Gaetz that McCarthy was the one trying to sabotage other House members who were considered for speakership, then all I can say is "birds of a feather flock together."
Yes, it is my bias moreso than this article, but I believe McCarthy is one of the kingpins behind the scenes trying to thwart the MAGA movement, because McCarthy is corruption through and through.
(Sorry, by which I mean, I do not disagree with you or your thinking, although I am still not convinced about mcCarthy one way or another. I would also encourage you or anyone to either remember the history of intel in the last century. There are always spies, double agents, and even triple agents.)
But my comment above is not concerned with the factuals or the useful data that the article provides. It's just me, again, trying to call out bullshite clickbaiters and bulldust headlines and sound the alert to what are, essentially, bad or potentially destructive practices by those that would deign to provide information. aka media.
When Q said "you are the news now" he paired it with "handle with care". I think it's very important for us anons not only to spread and share the real news, but to also point out and hold accountable those sources and 'media' (alt or mainstream or otherwise) that do NOT handle information with care, but with exploitative motives.
Bogus headline
The article delivers no information on where or how McCarthy has been "orchestrating Trumps removal from the ballot". It only talks about Singer as having previously funded McCarthy and McCarthy retiring.
This isn't a defense of McCarthy, but simply pointing out that clickbait headlines gonna clickbait headline.
Reading the article, I give it a 5 out of 10. It includes some useful information, but is far more concerned with spinning their own narrative, opinion and interpretation than it is about providing you, the reading with factual information so that you can make you your own mind.
Especially the "Caught red handed" bullshit headline.
Whether its 'left' or 'right' beware of media - mainstream or alt, that are trying to program you and influence you to their way of thinking.
Low grade journalism, imo.
That may be so, but ...
If Singer funds McCarthy, and we know what else Singer has been involved in, and we also know from Matt Gaetz that McCarthy was the one trying to sabotage other House members who were considered for speakership, then all I can say is "birds of a feather flock together."
Yes, it is my bias moreso than this article, but I believe McCarthy is one of the kingpins behind the scenes trying to thwart the MAGA movement, because McCarthy is corruption through and through.
Thank Mag. I don't dispute this, necessarily.
(Sorry, by which I mean, I do not disagree with you or your thinking, although I am still not convinced about mcCarthy one way or another. I would also encourage you or anyone to either remember the history of intel in the last century. There are always spies, double agents, and even triple agents.)
But my comment above is not concerned with the factuals or the useful data that the article provides. It's just me, again, trying to call out bullshite clickbaiters and bulldust headlines and sound the alert to what are, essentially, bad or potentially destructive practices by those that would deign to provide information. aka media.
When Q said "you are the news now" he paired it with "handle with care". I think it's very important for us anons not only to spread and share the real news, but to also point out and hold accountable those sources and 'media' (alt or mainstream or otherwise) that do NOT handle information with care, but with exploitative motives.
It's mah pet project!
This ☝️
I don't believe one single word of what you or they stated.
Have you learned nothing?