butt guise, boats go wild, they hit bridges all the time, you have no evidence it's intentional sabotage one after another, you're making us look bad, yada yada glow glow glow
The more I see this, the more this seems accurate.
Granted we have not been so focused on these water based things before that bridge went down. Though "watch the water" did have the radar up for many Anons to figure something out.
... I am convinced now. These things are just too weird & frequent to not be something. My experience with boats isn't based on ships with GPS & multiple redundancies. It runs more along the lines of both motors going out & everyone is stuck paddling the rest of the day unless another boat comes by that can tow off the lake.
I'm sure that if you did some research, you'll find plenty of river/bridge occurrences that happened before the bridge in Baltimore was destroyed.
Whenever something like that happens and catches a news cycle where it's picked up and goes viral, people are naturally paying more attention to that sort of thing afterwards and will start looking for similar occurrences.
It doesn't necessarily mean those things are happening more often, just that people are paying more attention to them and actively searching them out, so there's more visibility to things that were already there.
Remember when the train with toxic waste was derailed and afterwards where every few days it seemed like there was another train incident? It's been awhile since anyone has posted about trains, though, right? It doesn't mean that train problems stopped happening, just that people got tired of them.
It's going to be the same with the bridges. The next month or so, there will be several posts about bridges/rivers. And then they will just sort of die off and the next new, shiny news thing will happen that gets people excited, and they'll be obsessed with that for awhile. Then rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is more a commentary on how people consume news more than anything else, really.
I'm sure there are many more bridge incidents than just 5, depending on how big the area is you're looking at. I'm sure if you go back and look for them prior to the FSK bridge incident, you'll find plenty more.
I just commented about how it's not necessarily an increase of these incidents, just that people are actively looking for them after one of the incidents goes viral. Did you not read the entire comment I posted?
butt guise, boats go wild, they hit bridges all the time, you have no evidence it's intentional sabotage one after another, you're making us look bad, yada yada glow glow glow
The more I see this, the more this seems accurate.
Granted we have not been so focused on these water based things before that bridge went down. Though "watch the water" did have the radar up for many Anons to figure something out.
... I am convinced now. These things are just too weird & frequent to not be something. My experience with boats isn't based on ships with GPS & multiple redundancies. It runs more along the lines of both motors going out & everyone is stuck paddling the rest of the day unless another boat comes by that can tow off the lake.
I'm sure that if you did some research, you'll find plenty of river/bridge occurrences that happened before the bridge in Baltimore was destroyed.
Whenever something like that happens and catches a news cycle where it's picked up and goes viral, people are naturally paying more attention to that sort of thing afterwards and will start looking for similar occurrences.
It doesn't necessarily mean those things are happening more often, just that people are paying more attention to them and actively searching them out, so there's more visibility to things that were already there.
Remember when the train with toxic waste was derailed and afterwards where every few days it seemed like there was another train incident? It's been awhile since anyone has posted about trains, though, right? It doesn't mean that train problems stopped happening, just that people got tired of them.
It's going to be the same with the bridges. The next month or so, there will be several posts about bridges/rivers. And then they will just sort of die off and the next new, shiny news thing will happen that gets people excited, and they'll be obsessed with that for awhile. Then rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is more a commentary on how people consume news more than anything else, really.
This is about the 5th bridge incident in weeks. Do you even know of the others aside from FSK bridge?
I'm sure there are many more bridge incidents than just 5, depending on how big the area is you're looking at. I'm sure if you go back and look for them prior to the FSK bridge incident, you'll find plenty more.
I just commented about how it's not necessarily an increase of these incidents, just that people are actively looking for them after one of the incidents goes viral. Did you not read the entire comment I posted?