butt guise, boats go wild, they hit bridges all the time, you have no evidence it's intentional sabotage one after another, you're making us look bad, yada yada glow glow glow
The more I see this, the more this seems accurate.
Granted we have not been so focused on these water based things before that bridge went down. Though "watch the water" did have the radar up for many Anons to figure something out.
... I am convinced now. These things are just too weird & frequent to not be something. My experience with boats isn't based on ships with GPS & multiple redundancies. It runs more along the lines of both motors going out & everyone is stuck paddling the rest of the day unless another boat comes by that can tow off the lake.
I'm sure that if you did some research, you'll find plenty of river/bridge occurrences that happened before the bridge in Baltimore was destroyed.
Whenever something like that happens and catches a news cycle where it's picked up and goes viral, people are naturally paying more attention to that sort of thing afterwards and will start looking for similar occurrences.
It doesn't necessarily mean those things are happening more often, just that people are paying more attention to them and actively searching them out, so there's more visibility to things that were already there.
Remember when the train with toxic waste was derailed and afterwards where every few days it seemed like there was another train incident? It's been awhile since anyone has posted about trains, though, right? It doesn't mean that train problems stopped happening, just that people got tired of them.
It's going to be the same with the bridges. The next month or so, there will be several posts about bridges/rivers. And then they will just sort of die off and the next new, shiny news thing will happen that gets people excited, and they'll be obsessed with that for awhile. Then rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is more a commentary on how people consume news more than anything else, really.
You know, just because something is happening frequently over a long period of time does not preclude it from being of a nefarious nature.
If you understand the frogs in a pot metaphor, it absolutely makes sense to normalize attacks slowly so people make exactly the response you're making without questioning it further.
I didn't say that none of this was nefarious. I'm just not automatically jumping to the conclusion that every single thing that happens in life is evidence of anything, good or bad. Sometimes shit just happens.
What I'm trying to get people to do is to make fair, logical assessments of these occurrences. Because other than it being fun and exciting and bringing some entertainment to boring lives, there's really nothing positive to just jumping off the deep end and declaring everything out of the ordinary to happen is part of a conspiracy. Especially when those convictions are based on little more than social media post headlines. I would bet good money that most people here didn't even bother reading the article included in the OP where it says flooding from heavy rains were most likely the reason why the barges in this story broke free. Why bother to read the information provided in order to find a logical explanation for what happened when it's just so much more fun to come up with these elaborate scenarios where it's all part of some big plan to, what? Fuck up some dams or bridges or waterways or something?
Because that's exactly the type of thing that turns normies off and makes them ignore everything that might be lumped in with it.
So, it basically boils down to what one's ultimate goal is. Either its to red-pill normies, and stuff like this actively works against that, or it's to live in a cocoon of make believe where everything that ever happens is evidence people want to kill you and everyone you love, in which case, then this definitely helps to achieve that goal.
Again, this isn't to say that conspiracies aren't real, or that bad actors don't do evil things. Just that it's important to not become paranoid about it, and realize that it's important to take into consideration multiple factors beyond the obvious (i.e. "I'm seeing more stories about river/Bridge disasters in my social media feed, so that means river/bridge disasters are happening more!")
I guess what I'm really saying is that people should just be smarter about all this than what they're showing here.
I'm sure there are many more bridge incidents than just 5, depending on how big the area is you're looking at. I'm sure if you go back and look for them prior to the FSK bridge incident, you'll find plenty more.
I just commented about how it's not necessarily an increase of these incidents, just that people are actively looking for them after one of the incidents goes viral. Did you not read the entire comment I posted?
butt guise, boats go wild, they hit bridges all the time, you have no evidence it's intentional sabotage one after another, you're making us look bad, yada yada glow glow glow
Glow, glow, glow your boat
^that usernametho...and that comment, both fya af lmfao
u/#bahaha
Gently up your ass. Mary Lee something.
Oh the horrors of looking bad!
The more I see this, the more this seems accurate.
Granted we have not been so focused on these water based things before that bridge went down. Though "watch the water" did have the radar up for many Anons to figure something out.
... I am convinced now. These things are just too weird & frequent to not be something. My experience with boats isn't based on ships with GPS & multiple redundancies. It runs more along the lines of both motors going out & everyone is stuck paddling the rest of the day unless another boat comes by that can tow off the lake.
USS John McStain..........CCP Chips Ahoy
I'm sure that if you did some research, you'll find plenty of river/bridge occurrences that happened before the bridge in Baltimore was destroyed.
Whenever something like that happens and catches a news cycle where it's picked up and goes viral, people are naturally paying more attention to that sort of thing afterwards and will start looking for similar occurrences.
It doesn't necessarily mean those things are happening more often, just that people are paying more attention to them and actively searching them out, so there's more visibility to things that were already there.
Remember when the train with toxic waste was derailed and afterwards where every few days it seemed like there was another train incident? It's been awhile since anyone has posted about trains, though, right? It doesn't mean that train problems stopped happening, just that people got tired of them.
It's going to be the same with the bridges. The next month or so, there will be several posts about bridges/rivers. And then they will just sort of die off and the next new, shiny news thing will happen that gets people excited, and they'll be obsessed with that for awhile. Then rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is more a commentary on how people consume news more than anything else, really.
You know, just because something is happening frequently over a long period of time does not preclude it from being of a nefarious nature.
If you understand the frogs in a pot metaphor, it absolutely makes sense to normalize attacks slowly so people make exactly the response you're making without questioning it further.
I didn't say that none of this was nefarious. I'm just not automatically jumping to the conclusion that every single thing that happens in life is evidence of anything, good or bad. Sometimes shit just happens.
What I'm trying to get people to do is to make fair, logical assessments of these occurrences. Because other than it being fun and exciting and bringing some entertainment to boring lives, there's really nothing positive to just jumping off the deep end and declaring everything out of the ordinary to happen is part of a conspiracy. Especially when those convictions are based on little more than social media post headlines. I would bet good money that most people here didn't even bother reading the article included in the OP where it says flooding from heavy rains were most likely the reason why the barges in this story broke free. Why bother to read the information provided in order to find a logical explanation for what happened when it's just so much more fun to come up with these elaborate scenarios where it's all part of some big plan to, what? Fuck up some dams or bridges or waterways or something?
Because that's exactly the type of thing that turns normies off and makes them ignore everything that might be lumped in with it.
So, it basically boils down to what one's ultimate goal is. Either its to red-pill normies, and stuff like this actively works against that, or it's to live in a cocoon of make believe where everything that ever happens is evidence people want to kill you and everyone you love, in which case, then this definitely helps to achieve that goal.
Again, this isn't to say that conspiracies aren't real, or that bad actors don't do evil things. Just that it's important to not become paranoid about it, and realize that it's important to take into consideration multiple factors beyond the obvious (i.e. "I'm seeing more stories about river/Bridge disasters in my social media feed, so that means river/bridge disasters are happening more!")
I guess what I'm really saying is that people should just be smarter about all this than what they're showing here.
This is about the 5th bridge incident in weeks. Do you even know of the others aside from FSK bridge?
I'm sure there are many more bridge incidents than just 5, depending on how big the area is you're looking at. I'm sure if you go back and look for them prior to the FSK bridge incident, you'll find plenty more.
I just commented about how it's not necessarily an increase of these incidents, just that people are actively looking for them after one of the incidents goes viral. Did you not read the entire comment I posted?