Also the face keeps doing some possible weird lens thing, maybe computerized distortion.
I agree that generally speaking the video seems way too clear to be him.
Some red flags were going off watching it like that. Maybe it is an AI video, maybe it is real, maybe it is faked with the creators laughing...
I found it weird that the guy filming it felt the need to direct the way he spoke instead of just asking clarifying questions. Almost felt like a clown produced film.
Yes, the interviewer is quite disturbing. Doesn’t let the person speak freely, like if he planned to cut the interview into smaller pieces, but then what’s the value of an interview if small parts are cut without the context.
I also noticed that the eyeglasses change their size and it’s hard to explain it by him moving them as his hand was too far at that time.
At the end of the clip where she says “we should have gotten Kubrick”.
https://yandex.com/video/preview/4629184359797787059
thats_the_joke.png
Exactly. Slight of hand distraction and admittance at the same time. Tell me the truth without telling me.
Is this a real video of Kubrick?
The quality seems to be too good to be real, considering the time he lived. Died in 1999.
This is the TV news from 1999 announcing his death. The quality is way worse than the interview above: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-OB6Q0fotk
Why we can’t see his whole face?
Can it be fake?
Very good question. I leave that for viewers to decide. It is an unusual video to be sure. But there’s also Buzz: https://yandex.com/video/preview/14386801633012679265
Also the face keeps doing some possible weird lens thing, maybe computerized distortion.
I agree that generally speaking the video seems way too clear to be him.
Some red flags were going off watching it like that. Maybe it is an AI video, maybe it is real, maybe it is faked with the creators laughing...
I found it weird that the guy filming it felt the need to direct the way he spoke instead of just asking clarifying questions. Almost felt like a clown produced film.
Yes, the interviewer is quite disturbing. Doesn’t let the person speak freely, like if he planned to cut the interview into smaller pieces, but then what’s the value of an interview if small parts are cut without the context.
I also noticed that the eyeglasses change their size and it’s hard to explain it by him moving them as his hand was too far at that time.