War funding Speaker Mike Johnson gets ratio'ed by We The People represented by Clandestine
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Against it. I refuse to play that game. That's a bullshit game, and it is not MAGA.
You don't put us into the position of funding it or funding it. That is something an enemy puppet does.
Keep in mind, all the debt backed fraud will be blown to the sky as we head to the precipice.
You really aren't thinking that through, are you?
You really don't understand that other countries won't like that scenario. That creates its own slew of problems, and has a zero percent chance of becoming that weird utopia you seem to insist on.
Anyone who thinks that a Biden impeachment being put up by Mike would get through the Senate is insane, but a funding bill for Israel or Ukraine sure would.
You have been pulling for Mike this whole time, and I bet you aren't willing to admit that it's only because you are hoping he really is doing things like "stalling".
Explain to me which countries, who don't already have problems with the US/West will suddenly have problems with this? The lines have already been drawn my fren.
Sorry what? What exactly am I insisting will become a utopia?
Whats the difference between "stalling" and "refusing" something? Until you give in, there is no difference. But by "stalling" you are managing the blow back that you cant when you "refuse".
As far as I am concerned, I see no reason to hate Mike until he gives me a reason to.
Japan is our #1 debt holder. Even if we had control over the situation within their government, relations with the population would worsen.
UK is our third highest. No matter what I think about the British government, that is not our enemy by any means.
A world where we can snap our fingers and eliminate any amount of debt is a utopia.
One is a belief you hold that he is doing. The other is the direct opposite of what he is doing. He is not rejecting it, but you believe he is stalling.
These are two entirely different concepts.
But what you advocated for -- because yes when you instantly downvoted a response to a question you made (far be it from me to expect that a question like that was made in good faith seeking opinions, I guess) you were advocating -- was compromising on funding in exchange for putting up an impeachment.
We do not need to make such a deal. We are less than a year out from the next President (Trump) and if we have enough control over the Senate to impeach Biden (which nets us Kamala, yay? Not much better. I guess she doesn't sniff babies, but we wouldn't be getting justice for that anyway) then we have enough control over them to do it without funding attached.
Just wow.