Well, of he's going to start WW3 by not being in office, I see no threat of putting him back in. I mean hell, if he can do it OUT of office, what's the threat of him being IN the office?
I know. It was a joke. My point was, if you're scared of voting for him because he will start WW3, what's the point of worrying about it if he's going to do it regardless? Might as well vote for him and take advantage of things like lower mortgage rates, lower gas prices, lower inflation, less illegal immigration, etc. I mean if we're going to get WW3 either way... ;o)
Well, of he's going to start WW3 by not being in office, I see no threat of putting him back in. I mean hell, if he can do it OUT of office, what's the threat of him being IN the office?
They want to discourage votes. The less they have to cheat the less likely they'll get caught badly enough to make an impact.
He's got my vote regardless.
I know. It was a joke. My point was, if you're scared of voting for him because he will start WW3, what's the point of worrying about it if he's going to do it regardless? Might as well vote for him and take advantage of things like lower mortgage rates, lower gas prices, lower inflation, less illegal immigration, etc. I mean if we're going to get WW3 either way... ;o)