https://ianbrighthope.substack.com/p/mrna-is-a-class-one-carcinogen
(Found cross-posted by Dr. Jessica Rose, who introduces the link by saying "I literally said this yesterday").
This substack column is particularly important given that Big Pharma and Big Food are working feverishly to use mRNA in, apparently, everything.
For a quick summary in support of that (admittedly hyperbolic) assertion, I asked Leo, the Brave browser AI, "What products are mRNA being used in or considered to be used in?" and got the following reply:
mRNA technology is being explored for various products, including vaccines, cancer treatments, and gene therapies. Some companies are also investigating its use in agriculture and food production. However, it's important to note that most of these products are still in development and have not yet been approved for widespread use.
Ian's column includes detail about carcinogenicity and how various authorities define "carcinogenic" and provides some evidence (a very small amount compared to the totality of what is out there) that the mRNA "vaccines" are indeed carcinogenic. Below, the Conclusion:
CONCLUSION
Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS- CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown.
Commentary by Dr. John Campbell: (embedded YouTube video of Dr. Campbell speaking on the subject follows)
Rockz, not disagreeing with you but could you provide some data? I've spent literally hundreds of hours researching the C19 crime and every bit of data has pointed to the J&J shot being very dangerous for the reason I detailed in my original comment, but not using MRNA.
MRNA IS THE DELIVERY SYSTEM for the pfizer and moderna "vaccines". J&J does not use MRNA as a delivery system, it uses a disabled adenovirus to deliver the instructions. Both methods are extremely dangerous because they're programming your cells to produce spike protein for your immune system to react to. But every bit of research I've done points to a very distinct difference in these two methods.
I will reiterate: I do not endorse any of these death shots. But I stand by my original statement in that the J&J shot is slightly less lethal/dangerous than the MRNA-based shots.
https://www.vcuhealth.org/news/covid-19/johnson-and-johnson-vaccine-how-is-it-different#:~:text=What%20is%20the%20difference%20between,more%20traditional%20virus-based%20technology.
I remember Dr Tenpenny saying that is no different. It destroys the DNA the same way.
I looked for the video but can't find it now because you know how they pulled so much of that off the internet.