They will prove she is a woman. Then they will pass laws or at least cast aspersions against calling out "female" public figures as men. This will help clear the air for "My Michael" to run for president.
It may also help protect the legacy of Barbara Bush.
Regardless if that's a dude or not, we should all be concerned by the fact that she was dating him when he was a literal child and she's basically a pedophile groomer. The President of France is married to a groomer.
Why doesn't she just do a DNA test and prove all the "conspiracy theorists" wrong then?
I sort of thought this might be an op.
They will prove she is a woman. Then they will pass laws or at least cast aspersions against calling out "female" public figures as men. This will help clear the air for "My Michael" to run for president.
It may also help protect the legacy of Barbara Bush.
If there's even a doubt about whether you're a man or a woman... then it really doesn't matter. At best, you're an ugly woman.
Unless it is a man why would it care?
I'd like to see her/him try that here in the good old U.S.A. We have judges that can't even define what a woman is.
I think it is part of their admission to "the club" that they have to be humiliated and marry a butt ugly woman or a man.
Regardless if that's a dude or not, we should all be concerned by the fact that she was dating him when he was a literal child and she's basically a pedophile groomer. The President of France is married to a groomer. Why doesn't she just do a DNA test and prove all the "conspiracy theorists" wrong then?
https://nypost.com/2024/04/13/world-news/french-first-lady-brigitte-macron-sues-conspiracy-theorists-who-call-her-a-man/
No, because discovery is a real bitch. Dick wearing transvestites are then easily eh ... disrobed of appearances.
There is one sure way to prove it either which way………………………………….