OK. That would imply you dispute Q's input on the matter? I'm just wondering if you are you aware of what Jones was doing in 2018, and his efforts to hijack and or derail the Q operation? Or the occasions he turned on Trump in a heartbeat, before flipping back?
It may well be that Jones has flipped or come around. He himself has confessed (affirmed) that he is an actor, performing. He's a brilliant performer, at the very least.
Whether his behavior is genuine or not, well, I personally couldn't gage that simply on my own subjective reflections. The case (evidence) against Jones, for being controlled opposition / intel agent is pretty strong.
Nonetheless, at the end of the day, I don't know for certain one way or another. But I am curious as to why he would promote the obvious fraud Najadi.... or perhaps he was simply presenting, not promoting.
If there is really a Q operation (and I believe there is) then wouldn’t you also think that many of the actors in that operation will be tasked with denying the existence of the operation?
No, I don't think that many involved would be tasked with denying it. Some involved would have to make it seem like they weren't involved, or to actually deny it as keeping part of their cover, or obscure any possible involvement. I think specifically of Trump, Flynn (who Q highlighted in an ultra-positive way) and Kash Patel (who Q also highlighted in a positive way).
Jones, however, after the Q operation gained steam and increased following in mid-2018, attempted to hijack the Q operation, and was called out by Q directly. He did not deny Q when it started, but then together with Jerome Corsi started delivering 'decodes' and then went on to say "I know who Q is, I know the people in the operation" and "This guy is Q...." and "This guy I have here is better than Q, knows more than Q".
He also then later went on record denying the Q drops after a certain time were the legitimate Q. Not denying the Q operation, but seeking to discredit the drops after he had later been exposed (highlighted in a very negative way) by Q.
So, I would say that there are numerous points of distinction between those who's names have been dropped by Q pointing towards their validity, even if they themselves have covered their tracks, and Jones, who Q outed as a usurper and asset.
One pivotal juncture was when Serial Brain 2 posted a post on Reddit r/GreatAwakening entitled "The long and secret info wars against Q" in which he analyses and dissects the evidence and calls out the Jones operation attempting to undermine and hijack the Q operation. Q then posted a drop #1340 that directly linked to this post and stated: this is why we are here.
What is very notable is that patriots and anons had been posting on r/GreatAwakening for many months at that point, and the subscriber base was steadily growing, but this was the FIRST time that Q ever linked to a post on r/GreatAwakening.
This highlighted the post even more, because it came across as both a powerful validation and endorsement of the contents of SerialBrain2's post, and also was the first public recognition that Q gave to the subreddit itself.
Q's drop came the day following when SB2 posted it.
There are many reasons to question exactly what Jones is and what purposes he serves. Many, many factual reasons, and it is not lightly that anons hold their positions on Jones as a mossad asset and operative.
Some who are patriots are denounced as controlled opposition, and some who are operatives are lauded as patriots. This is the nature of information warfare and the psywar that is underway. To navigate the battlefield, its important to gather evidence, apply critical thinking, reflect on one's own biases and beliefs, and their foundation, and persevere.
For all of the above reasons, I see Jones very differently to how I see others who many anons affirm are part of the Q operation or who have some knowledge of it. I just recommend not being too attached to one's position. (For example, it can be noted that on the morning of Jan 6, just before the start of the Trump Rally, Gen. Flynn himself did an interview with Jones.)
In the end, there is a limit to how much we can actually "know" about who is doing what etc. After all, its shadow warfare. What we can do is to check our own perspectives, question them in the light of as much evidence as possible, and then formulate theories and on the basis of those, adopt beliefs or positions of conviction.
Hopefully, there is something in the above worth your attention, regardless of what conclusions you come to.
I don’t buy that Alex is working for the event. Not at all. He oozes patriotism and God when he does his thing. It’s genuine.
OK. That would imply you dispute Q's input on the matter? I'm just wondering if you are you aware of what Jones was doing in 2018, and his efforts to hijack and or derail the Q operation? Or the occasions he turned on Trump in a heartbeat, before flipping back?
It may well be that Jones has flipped or come around. He himself has confessed (affirmed) that he is an actor, performing. He's a brilliant performer, at the very least.
Whether his behavior is genuine or not, well, I personally couldn't gage that simply on my own subjective reflections. The case (evidence) against Jones, for being controlled opposition / intel agent is pretty strong.
Nonetheless, at the end of the day, I don't know for certain one way or another. But I am curious as to why he would promote the obvious fraud Najadi.... or perhaps he was simply presenting, not promoting.
If there is really a Q operation (and I believe there is) then wouldn’t you also think that many of the actors in that operation will be tasked with denying the existence of the operation?
No, I don't think that many involved would be tasked with denying it. Some involved would have to make it seem like they weren't involved, or to actually deny it as keeping part of their cover, or obscure any possible involvement. I think specifically of Trump, Flynn (who Q highlighted in an ultra-positive way) and Kash Patel (who Q also highlighted in a positive way).
Jones, however, after the Q operation gained steam and increased following in mid-2018, attempted to hijack the Q operation, and was called out by Q directly. He did not deny Q when it started, but then together with Jerome Corsi started delivering 'decodes' and then went on to say "I know who Q is, I know the people in the operation" and "This guy is Q...." and "This guy I have here is better than Q, knows more than Q".
He also then later went on record denying the Q drops after a certain time were the legitimate Q. Not denying the Q operation, but seeking to discredit the drops after he had later been exposed (highlighted in a very negative way) by Q.
So, I would say that there are numerous points of distinction between those who's names have been dropped by Q pointing towards their validity, even if they themselves have covered their tracks, and Jones, who Q outed as a usurper and asset.
One pivotal juncture was when Serial Brain 2 posted a post on Reddit r/GreatAwakening entitled "The long and secret info wars against Q" in which he analyses and dissects the evidence and calls out the Jones operation attempting to undermine and hijack the Q operation. Q then posted a drop #1340 that directly linked to this post and stated: this is why we are here.
u/#q1340
r/GreatAwakening was banned and shut down, but here is the archive of that post. You may want to read it.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180511000043/https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ia0vu/the_long_and_secret_info_wars_against_q_and_how/
What is very notable is that patriots and anons had been posting on r/GreatAwakening for many months at that point, and the subscriber base was steadily growing, but this was the FIRST time that Q ever linked to a post on r/GreatAwakening.
This highlighted the post even more, because it came across as both a powerful validation and endorsement of the contents of SerialBrain2's post, and also was the first public recognition that Q gave to the subreddit itself.
Q's drop came the day following when SB2 posted it.
There are many reasons to question exactly what Jones is and what purposes he serves. Many, many factual reasons, and it is not lightly that anons hold their positions on Jones as a mossad asset and operative.
Some who are patriots are denounced as controlled opposition, and some who are operatives are lauded as patriots. This is the nature of information warfare and the psywar that is underway. To navigate the battlefield, its important to gather evidence, apply critical thinking, reflect on one's own biases and beliefs, and their foundation, and persevere.
For all of the above reasons, I see Jones very differently to how I see others who many anons affirm are part of the Q operation or who have some knowledge of it. I just recommend not being too attached to one's position. (For example, it can be noted that on the morning of Jan 6, just before the start of the Trump Rally, Gen. Flynn himself did an interview with Jones.)
In the end, there is a limit to how much we can actually "know" about who is doing what etc. After all, its shadow warfare. What we can do is to check our own perspectives, question them in the light of as much evidence as possible, and then formulate theories and on the basis of those, adopt beliefs or positions of conviction.
Hopefully, there is something in the above worth your attention, regardless of what conclusions you come to.
wwgawg1
addendum: it was in the context of the Jones/Corsi attempted coup that Q first posted the now famous line:
[be careful who you follow]
context: On May 10, 2018, Q posted about Patriots and Traitors, about fake and false decodes, warning about not falling to con artists, etc.
Q mentioned NO NAMES at all, but immediately after that, Jones & Corsi came out and started denying that the one posting the drops was Q.
They outed themselves.
Not sure where you were, but along with hundreds of thousands of other anons, we saw these events unfold in real time.
ON May 12, Q posted this:
u/#q1343
Contextually, from the Q board AND from the chans they were dropped on, it was clear to all that Q was talking about Jones.
Make of it what you will!