SCOTUS.🚨

The Supreme Court is Likely to Uphold Presidential Immunity for Donald Trump: Analysis

“After listening to arguments at the Supreme Court, it’s clear the justices will narrowly hold the President of the United States—any president—is immune from criminal prosecution for official (not personal) acts," the Article 3 Project's Legal Analyst @mrddmia said in an official statement.

"Additionally or alternatively, the Court will reaffirm criminal statutes do not apply to the President, unless they are explicit. The Court will remand Jack Smith’s January 6th case to DC Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan for an evidentiary hearing. Her decision is immediately appealable to the DC Circuit, and the Supreme Court could take the case again before trial."

"The Court’s likely holding will also substantially affect Fani Willis’ January 6th case—and may affect Jack Smith’s presidential-records case. And the Supreme Court’s Fischer decision on obstruction will likely destroy two of Jack Smith’s four January 6th charges against Trump. Only 20% of Jack Smith’s January 6th case will remain. The case will not get tried before the election."

“Bottom line: This will become a historic win for President Trump—and the presidency and our country. This is a big step toward undoing the Democrats’ republic-ending lawfare and election interference against President Trump."

👉🏻 https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1783538524257391085?t=ZFePna-V_PrF3kMUEMcoyQ&s=19

36 comments

36 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (36)

sorted by:

▲ 10 ▼

– swimkin 10 points 216 days ago +10 / -0

There’s no immunity from Treason.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 6 ▼

– ZeroDeltaTango 6 points 216 days ago +6 / -0

Right, because treason, like many other crimes one might commit, is not an official act.

All that has to happen is for the court to decide a president's actions were for personal gain—like claiming a stolen election was fraudulent—instead of official, and there's no immunity. Barrett was laser focused on getting Trump's atty to admit to several things he's charged with, including challenging the stolen election, that were personal acts and therefore not protected by immunity.

No one who opposes Trump has ever explained what they think Americans SHOULD do if an election is stolen and there's a sea of evidence to prove it including almost 1000 election workers who swore under penalty of perjury that they saw it happen and gave detailed descriptions that supported the sworn affidavits of other poll workers. What should the people do, not protest?