I need to understand what you are saying. I pulled the article up when I saw it and I copied the URL and then I came here and posted a "linked" post where I pasted the URL. Tell me what I did wrong and I promise I will NOT do it again because you are absolutely correct. We don't want to "give" them anything.
Keep doing what you’re doing Fren. Copy and send far and wide. We are different because by adding our snarky comments to the link we crack the narrative. Unfortunately we have a lot more cracks to produce. Carry on 🐸
Im just saying giving their website traffic gets them paid. By archiving links it lets people read the page without actually going to the original website. u/Irishman4Trump6 is partially right in that giving context to the article helps break their narrative but the website still gets the traffic, advertisers see their numbers, they dont see viewers opinions.
Well its really easy. Just type archive.is in the web browser and there will be detailed info there. But basically you just copy paste a URL into the first text box and click save. It will take a minute to do so and will redirect you to the archived page it made. Then you just copy that URL to share with people. Sometimes these news sites have that "click to continue reading" button which might prevent the archived page from loading the whole article, maybe clicking that button before copying the URL to archive might work. But they put that click to continue feature in to get more traffic on their site basically ensuring they get double the numbers if you want to read the whole thing. But if the story is from a biased outlet that is clearly writing hit jobs then to be honest its not worth reading in its entirety in the first place.
First of all dont give the globalists any clicks, they dont deserve the money. I archived the page for anyone who actually wants to read their slime.
https://archive.is/njbQG
I need to understand what you are saying. I pulled the article up when I saw it and I copied the URL and then I came here and posted a "linked" post where I pasted the URL. Tell me what I did wrong and I promise I will NOT do it again because you are absolutely correct. We don't want to "give" them anything.
Keep doing what you’re doing Fren. Copy and send far and wide. We are different because by adding our snarky comments to the link we crack the narrative. Unfortunately we have a lot more cracks to produce. Carry on 🐸
Thank you for that.
Im just saying giving their website traffic gets them paid. By archiving links it lets people read the page without actually going to the original website. u/Irishman4Trump6 is partially right in that giving context to the article helps break their narrative but the website still gets the traffic, advertisers see their numbers, they dont see viewers opinions.
I'm a 67 year old woman and I haven't clue to how to "archive" an article but I will if you will teach me with step by step instructions.
Well its really easy. Just type archive.is in the web browser and there will be detailed info there. But basically you just copy paste a URL into the first text box and click save. It will take a minute to do so and will redirect you to the archived page it made. Then you just copy that URL to share with people. Sometimes these news sites have that "click to continue reading" button which might prevent the archived page from loading the whole article, maybe clicking that button before copying the URL to archive might work. But they put that click to continue feature in to get more traffic on their site basically ensuring they get double the numbers if you want to read the whole thing. But if the story is from a biased outlet that is clearly writing hit jobs then to be honest its not worth reading in its entirety in the first place.