I believe that we can confidently declare that the "Israel for last" phase of Q's operation has officially begun. The Deep State is in a full frenzied PANIC over the conversations happening across The United States. The University riots are just the beginning!
(media.greatawakening.win)
- N C S W I C -
I disagree, banning people who have dual citizenship from (self)serving is not even a moral quandary.
Do we specify which dual citizenships are a different class? Do we say "if you are an Iranian American dual citizen, you can't run for office but if you are Israeli American dual citizen, you can"?
That's an even bigger crisis of both legal and moral problems.
An oath is meaningless. If you do not respect an oath, if you have no moral compass or belief in a higher good or keep yourself to a high standard, then you can make any number of oaths but it doesn't make them binding. They'll just find new ways to avoid being caught.
With a ban, you can at least remove the conundrum and temptation at the root.
Here are some threads I dug up on my ideas for this.
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1RMm3OT/x/c/4ZA2uZyKRfM
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1RLeD2H/x/c/4ZA2uQeRKtf
https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1MiO94P/x/c/4ZA2tyc5vBl
Why don’t we have a thread here where we write legislation and how and where and when to try and demand they bring it to the floor for votes?
We currently let think tanks and lobby groups write all our legislation. Why not try and do it here?
For starters, how about a bill that takes away their authority to create and vote on their own committees and instead have to pass it down to the people or the states for a vote?
Or how about a bill that lets us vote on whether these committees should even exist?
By whose authority did they get the ability to make these committees? Their own?
As far as I can tell, we agree. What I meant is not that it’s a moral quandary, or shouldn’t be banned, it’s just that I don’t think bans work very well from a practical standpoint, especially at the levels of writing and enforcing the bans themselves. It could definitely be a starting point, though, if there was a way to get it in place.
What might be better long term is if the people at large have an active mechanism to remove people where this is violated. Reproach for the non-represented who are affected by the negligence or vast populatory manipulations of, let’s say, NYC.
If we were able to conditionally fund the government would be even better. Might even need a way to revoke funding of others so it doesn’t turn into the auction it currently is. Give government a social credit score. If they/we are serious about wanting to serve, they’ll accept it.
Just spitballing some ways to deal with ineffective practices.