Evidence from Mar a lago was tampered with and then prosecutors lied to the judge about it. I believe it was Walt Nuatas attorney who brought this to light when he couldnt cross reference what was there with the logs of what should be there.
I was able to find the motion with the footnote and read it, but haven't found Nauta's original filing, but it appears all he is asking for is more time. He's not claiming some grand big thing.
The deadline is next week. So we will see if the judge grants more time or something else.
The trial date is still set to later this month. She has yet to move it
I didnt say Nuatas lawyer is claiming anything. All he said is that when he tried to cross reference he was stymied. It is others claiming evidence tampering because what Nuatas attorney is describing is exactly that.
Evidence from Mar a lago was tampered with and then prosecutors lied to the judge about it. I believe it was Walt Nuatas attorney who brought this to light when he couldnt cross reference what was there with the logs of what should be there.
Is Nauta's attorney claiming a "fraud on the court" because it seems we might be going further than the people actually familiar with the facts.
I think what is being described is tampering with evidence.
I was able to find the motion with the footnote and read it, but haven't found Nauta's original filing, but it appears all he is asking for is more time. He's not claiming some grand big thing.
The deadline is next week. So we will see if the judge grants more time or something else.
The trial date is still set to later this month. She has yet to move it
I didnt say Nuatas lawyer is claiming anything. All he said is that when he tried to cross reference he was stymied. It is others claiming evidence tampering because what Nuatas attorney is describing is exactly that.