I watched this whole thing and was sucked in until about 3/4 of the way through. Then a few things hit me. First - this was a very professional video. Too professional to come from a scientist/journalist. Who really backed this and filmed/edited it? Second - I was amazed at how fast I believed everything that was said. I never saw that guy before tonight, and suddenly I was believing everything he put out. And third - why was Q brought up, and Byrne/Flynn? So what if one of the PV people believed in Q and had pictures taken with a bunch of important people? They could've gotten those pics at a CPAC or some other conservative event and made them look like whatever they wanted. It just didn't seem important to the video and looked more like a hit job.
I don't know if this guy is telling the truth, or even if he is a WH or a BH. My gut instinct is this was put out by the left to discredit O'Keefe, Q, Flynn, while at the same time doing the same stuff the left/DS always does. We talk about it all the time - how they have to tell us what they are doing. Maybe they know they are caught, and are putting the info out themselves while putting some people caught on tape out as the fall-guys. For that matter, this could have been put out by someone like Speilberg (who has been known to help the left) to help Biden get revenge for Ashley's diary.
None of this means that I don't think the vaxxes are bad - they are absolutely biological weapons and are killing people. My sister was one of those that were killed. By the way u/GGRockz - I am so sorry to hear about your sister. You two had lots of prayers from here.
I just don't buy this video, but I'm sure this will cause a shit-storm in the media and at some point we will know if it is true or not. I appreciate this being posted (real or not) because it forced me to stop and realize I could be falling for DS propaganda, or I could be seeing proof of big pharma killing people for money.
I'm not sure of what to think about the Grove. A lot of bad people went there, but so did Reagan, Nixon, and Gingrich. Is there solid proof O'Keefe went there? Would it matter if he went there for the experience or he went there to do an undercover story? If you think about that either/or question do you think the Grove members would even allow him to go there? Maybe they know he is bad, or maybe he didn't go. Who knows?
As for the O'Keefe bombshells that were never shown - No idea. Maybe he was blackmailed like most of CONgress or other govt agencies. Maybe he was threatened. Maybe he is bad and didn't want those stories to see the light of day. I think he is pretty much an arrogant asshole (like has been rumored for a while) but is good at what he does.
Consider this - if you had a scoop that involved the corrupt US govt and the POTUS, that has already stolen an election and is trying to steal another while using lawfare to eliminate his opponent, and has already come after you and your employees via an FBI raid - what would you do? O'Keefe didn't just poke the bear... he knocked the bear out and shaved it's genitals. (gotta remember to write this one down - it's a keeper)
I know nothing about Brian Gamble or his wife. I never got into any of the "Q influencers". I don't watch any of the podcasts, I don't care what they think (they know nothing - maybe less than us on GAW), and I would rather dig on stuff that comes up here or 8kun.
Sorry about all the "maybes" - it's just how my brain works. I'm somewhere on the autism spectrum and tend to see a lot of black and white. My brain works on those issues until it picks the most likely situation. For everything. Even when I am driving I always have at least 2 ways in mind to get out of my lane if something happens, and I'm watching the cars in front of the car in front of me. It gets annoying.
Awesome comment, fren. I did a similar self-check. Leslie could easily be a treble agent with O’Keefe his handler. Walker is tipped off (if Leslie is genuine) or read in (if Leslie is a snake) and able to slide narrative under the radar while creating a highly malleable release for O’Keefe to stage manage.
What could be more “undercover” than concocting the illusion of a double agent sting then using a treble agent putting out his own exposé where we are the unwitting victims behind the fourth wall? O’Keefe gets to be the good guy and use “illegal recording” lawfare and ‘protect the whistleblower’ ethics as alibis to hand wave away accusations of burying important evidence (vial contents, blood samples, ‘gaming the FDA’ admission etc). Pfizer get to divert scrutiny from their nefariousness, and amplify their new shiny thing, “disinformation criminals”, about which this film could be held up as exemplary in their eyes. And Leslie gets to build a new profile as the Truther’s Truther, with a walk-on part as official gatekeeper and disinfo agent.
I’d seen a version of the O’Keefe meets Walker scene before, now it looks like hammy overacting. And when Leslie says to O’Keefe about his Bohemian Grove admission, “it’s the most powerful secret society in the world”, this comes across as scripted, not to mention naive and easily demonstrably inaccurate. For a start, it’s a place. And there are plenty of other secret societies chock full of dipshits who could be considered biggest.
It’s easy to forget where a lot of these faces we have come to know and in some cases trust, actually used to work. Maybe we shouldn’t.
Very interestingly, I had similar internal conflicts... like who is this guy? Again, particularly around the mud flinging with flynn and all of the others, it seemed a bit like a shotgun approach to demand answers when he had serious doubts on the directions being taken.
Seemingly, he was vouched for as the Pfizer insider... so that kind of squelched those internal skepticisms on the evidence regarding the vials, the microscope tapes, etc. But again, I don't think this kid knows enough to be able to say all of those in the Q movement are all against the truth; I find that hard to believe.
I also thought that maybe someone in the old PV crew helped put that together... too organized for a newer journalist.
I watched this whole thing and was sucked in until about 3/4 of the way through. Then a few things hit me. First - this was a very professional video. Too professional to come from a scientist/journalist. Who really backed this and filmed/edited it? Second - I was amazed at how fast I believed everything that was said. I never saw that guy before tonight, and suddenly I was believing everything he put out. And third - why was Q brought up, and Byrne/Flynn? So what if one of the PV people believed in Q and had pictures taken with a bunch of important people? They could've gotten those pics at a CPAC or some other conservative event and made them look like whatever they wanted. It just didn't seem important to the video and looked more like a hit job.
I don't know if this guy is telling the truth, or even if he is a WH or a BH. My gut instinct is this was put out by the left to discredit O'Keefe, Q, Flynn, while at the same time doing the same stuff the left/DS always does. We talk about it all the time - how they have to tell us what they are doing. Maybe they know they are caught, and are putting the info out themselves while putting some people caught on tape out as the fall-guys. For that matter, this could have been put out by someone like Speilberg (who has been known to help the left) to help Biden get revenge for Ashley's diary.
None of this means that I don't think the vaxxes are bad - they are absolutely biological weapons and are killing people. My sister was one of those that were killed. By the way u/GGRockz - I am so sorry to hear about your sister. You two had lots of prayers from here.
I just don't buy this video, but I'm sure this will cause a shit-storm in the media and at some point we will know if it is true or not. I appreciate this being posted (real or not) because it forced me to stop and realize I could be falling for DS propaganda, or I could be seeing proof of big pharma killing people for money.
Funny my husband said maybe this is the other side promoting this. He thought exactly the same thing you did.
My point is he has evidence she showed of people at Pfizer along with O'Keefe going to Bohemian Grove.
I remember when O'Keefe said he has bombshell interviews. Then NOTHING. He went silent.
Brian Gamble is connected to a lot of the wrong people.
Just my opinion.
I'm not sure of what to think about the Grove. A lot of bad people went there, but so did Reagan, Nixon, and Gingrich. Is there solid proof O'Keefe went there? Would it matter if he went there for the experience or he went there to do an undercover story? If you think about that either/or question do you think the Grove members would even allow him to go there? Maybe they know he is bad, or maybe he didn't go. Who knows?
As for the O'Keefe bombshells that were never shown - No idea. Maybe he was blackmailed like most of CONgress or other govt agencies. Maybe he was threatened. Maybe he is bad and didn't want those stories to see the light of day. I think he is pretty much an arrogant asshole (like has been rumored for a while) but is good at what he does.
Consider this - if you had a scoop that involved the corrupt US govt and the POTUS, that has already stolen an election and is trying to steal another while using lawfare to eliminate his opponent, and has already come after you and your employees via an FBI raid - what would you do? O'Keefe didn't just poke the bear... he knocked the bear out and shaved it's genitals. (gotta remember to write this one down - it's a keeper)
I know nothing about Brian Gamble or his wife. I never got into any of the "Q influencers". I don't watch any of the podcasts, I don't care what they think (they know nothing - maybe less than us on GAW), and I would rather dig on stuff that comes up here or 8kun.
Sorry about all the "maybes" - it's just how my brain works. I'm somewhere on the autism spectrum and tend to see a lot of black and white. My brain works on those issues until it picks the most likely situation. For everything. Even when I am driving I always have at least 2 ways in mind to get out of my lane if something happens, and I'm watching the cars in front of the car in front of me. It gets annoying.
Awesome comment, fren. I did a similar self-check. Leslie could easily be a treble agent with O’Keefe his handler. Walker is tipped off (if Leslie is genuine) or read in (if Leslie is a snake) and able to slide narrative under the radar while creating a highly malleable release for O’Keefe to stage manage.
What could be more “undercover” than concocting the illusion of a double agent sting then using a treble agent putting out his own exposé where we are the unwitting victims behind the fourth wall? O’Keefe gets to be the good guy and use “illegal recording” lawfare and ‘protect the whistleblower’ ethics as alibis to hand wave away accusations of burying important evidence (vial contents, blood samples, ‘gaming the FDA’ admission etc). Pfizer get to divert scrutiny from their nefariousness, and amplify their new shiny thing, “disinformation criminals”, about which this film could be held up as exemplary in their eyes. And Leslie gets to build a new profile as the Truther’s Truther, with a walk-on part as official gatekeeper and disinfo agent.
I’d seen a version of the O’Keefe meets Walker scene before, now it looks like hammy overacting. And when Leslie says to O’Keefe about his Bohemian Grove admission, “it’s the most powerful secret society in the world”, this comes across as scripted, not to mention naive and easily demonstrably inaccurate. For a start, it’s a place. And there are plenty of other secret societies chock full of dipshits who could be considered biggest.
It’s easy to forget where a lot of these faces we have come to know and in some cases trust, actually used to work. Maybe we shouldn’t.
Very interestingly, I had similar internal conflicts... like who is this guy? Again, particularly around the mud flinging with flynn and all of the others, it seemed a bit like a shotgun approach to demand answers when he had serious doubts on the directions being taken.
Seemingly, he was vouched for as the Pfizer insider... so that kind of squelched those internal skepticisms on the evidence regarding the vials, the microscope tapes, etc. But again, I don't think this kid knows enough to be able to say all of those in the Q movement are all against the truth; I find that hard to believe.
I also thought that maybe someone in the old PV crew helped put that together... too organized for a newer journalist.