Q also said disinformation is necessary. If Q said at that time moon landings were hoaxes, most people wouldn't have followed Q and this board wouldn't have existed.
So if Q was lying about the moon, what else are they lying about?
Is there a plan at all?
Was this the greatest stroke of Operation Trust ever made?
Imagine begging for your life at the end of a government rifle barrel that you never resisted before because you had faith in the Q plan, you tell them "But I thought nothing could stop what's coming!" only for the last thing you ever hear to be three words:
What if i told you the moon landing were real but some of the footage was fake because they didn't want to show the public what they really found? Wouldn't that make the most sense considering the evidence and redaction or evidence? (the "oops we lost the photos" part etc)
Not the remotest chance. How do you "know" any photos are "fake"? Just saying so doesn't make it so. People commonly are too ignorant to understand what they are seeing, and interpose their "common sense" to deny truthful photography, when in fact the photography shows things that could be seen only on the Moon.
Anything and everything is possible. From what I understand from past 10 years of hearing on debunking NASA, everything is fabricated including controlled opposition psyop that's not mainstream - they found aliens on moon and hence the cover up.Yeah, right! Its the same "look here, not there" plot.
Q also said disinformation is necessary. If Q said at that time moon landings were hoaxes, most people wouldn't have followed Q and this board wouldn't have existed.
So if Q was lying about the moon, what else are they lying about?
Is there a plan at all?
Was this the greatest stroke of Operation Trust ever made?
Imagine begging for your life at the end of a government rifle barrel that you never resisted before because you had faith in the Q plan, you tell them "But I thought nothing could stop what's coming!" only for the last thing you ever hear to be three words:
"Disinformation is necessary."
BLAM
Kek! That's the 4th expression before the BAM!
What if i told you the moon landing were real but some of the footage was fake because they didn't want to show the public what they really found? Wouldn't that make the most sense considering the evidence and redaction or evidence? (the "oops we lost the photos" part etc)
Not the remotest chance. How do you "know" any photos are "fake"? Just saying so doesn't make it so. People commonly are too ignorant to understand what they are seeing, and interpose their "common sense" to deny truthful photography, when in fact the photography shows things that could be seen only on the Moon.
Anything and everything is possible. From what I understand from past 10 years of hearing on debunking NASA, everything is fabricated including controlled opposition psyop that's not mainstream - they found aliens on moon and hence the cover up.Yeah, right! Its the same "look here, not there" plot.