So you're calling me retarded? The son of very and powerful and smart parents with access to IA and knowledge resources you probably cant imagine couldn't be the head of the Q team? Get a grip...
Yes yes I am. You trot out two links about the idea of child prodigies, neither of which mention Barron - just that smart children exist, as your proof? Do way way better.
Oh, I'm sorry! My mistake. Now that I know that since he isn't listed publicity as a child genius that means that he couldn't possibly ever be one. Thanks for the "community notes"
I dunno m’am, You provided nothing of value about Barron’s potential. It’s like me saying “I think so and so is a murderer” and then I send you the Wikipedia page of famous murderers. That’s not research, it’s reaching.
You think Barron Trump was talking to us on 8Chan, at the age of 10? Mam, you might actually be retarded, and not in the fun way.
who said the time traveler was 10 at the time?
You mean, Barron is actually Austin Steinbart? Wow. I never suspected.....
Hey,
don't assume her gender.
edit: this was sarcasm lol
Note: not all pedes can read sarcasm.
I personally don't like to add "/s" unless really necessary, I feel like it takes away from the humor of the sarcasm itself.
Good sarcasm to me is when you second-guess yourself whether it's sarcasm or not.
Note: not all sarcasm requires an /s.
I thought your comment was extremely kekful. And obvious.
Sometimes even adding an /s doesn't help some folks to get it..... !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_child_prodigies
https://wecapable.com/high-iq-children/
So you're calling me retarded? The son of very and powerful and smart parents with access to IA and knowledge resources you probably cant imagine couldn't be the head of the Q team? Get a grip...
Yes yes I am. You trot out two links about the idea of child prodigies, neither of which mention Barron - just that smart children exist, as your proof? Do way way better.
Oh, I'm sorry! My mistake. Now that I know that since he isn't listed publicity as a child genius that means that he couldn't possibly ever be one. Thanks for the "community notes"
....Come on people.
I dunno m’am, You provided nothing of value about Barron’s potential. It’s like me saying “I think so and so is a murderer” and then I send you the Wikipedia page of famous murderers. That’s not research, it’s reaching.