It's like those "new" Navy stealth fighters that made the rounds a few years ago. Taken directly from the movie "Stealth". Those things wouldn't make it into the air, with all the crud mistakes.
Successful weapons or reconnaissance systems, like the U-2 or the SR-1, never advertise ahead of time, we always find out about them years after they have been in service. This silly article just invites Russian sabotage and/or close monitoring. Each new sub could be neutralized as it left the builder's port.
EDIT: One place I could see these being used successfully would be if the Narco gangs in Mexico and South America wanted a new way of smuggling drugs into America. Could the Coast Guard find these?
And...
This is very likely fake. Why would you paint hi-viz stripes on a submarine intended to operate close to the surface attaching mines to ships. I would expect it to be colored for stealth.
Top left “photo” looks photoshopped to put it in place of something that would be in airplane hanger. Big door looks like airplane hanger door. Why would a submarine be in an airplane hanger instead of a drydock of some sort?
I am not a submarine designer or an engineer. But my grease monkey bones say that is not a good design to accomplish what they say it can do. While it looks like it could be featured in the next DC comics movie, it seems to me that if you are trying to move stealthily through the water at high speeds you would want the smallest possible frontal area, not big wings.
So far, Russia has listed only one Abrams. It was apparently stripped of all the good stuff. On display at the Moscow "Trophies" event.
Incidentally, all that mil stuff bidan et al "sent" seems to have disappeared; pentagon and the rest of that crew stated long ago that "the shipments can't be traced past ports." I surmise that was part of the movie; I doubt that the CiC would allow it. Remember, bidan and pelosi both stated, when asked when the US would send troops to Ukr, "We aren't allowed to send troops."
Having been one of those ASW types, I'd love to see something like that at sea. We'd have had that sucker instantly. It would never survive. You can see quite a ways down under in clear ocean waters. End of story.
Besides the fakery, how many here really know the capabilities of current subs, or even the capabilities they had back in the 60s, when I was Navy? Guaranteed, precious few know; also guaranteed, USN didn't stop developing. Neither did Russia.
The dipping sonar back when I was ASW was the AQS-13. A good operator could hear everything down there. Also, there are layers of warmer/colder waters; getting into a layer was easy, if the cable was long enough. Biggest problem was the helo noise, but the Navy developed a helmet that just about got rid of that: couldn't hear anything outside that headgear.
Operator could almost hear a couple crabs "duking it out on the floor". It was pretty easy to tell a sub class from the screw noise, and that's almost impossible to get rid of for a sub. They can be quiet, but not all quiet. Our max range was 20,000 yards, 360 degrees. A ping was 189 degrees, alternating between halves. I picked up a nuke, US, at the end of an exercise, over in Hawaii, at about 20k, tracked him all the way across (40k yards); that nuke boat was clocking in at around 54 kt under water. He was gone in a fairly short time, considering.
Aside from that, the mil does NOT divulge capabilities in any way other than the obvious. For instance, our helo was claimed to have a top end of 166 kt top airspeed. In the Nam, on a rescue up north, I was in one going 210 kt, just below tip stall. That's 199 mph vs 252 mph, roughly. They also hide operations and change history.
ok. that 'thing' has so many sharp angles & protrusions a cheap fish-finder will spot its signature from 20 nautical miles away while its motionless.
gotta be a hoax or movie prop. looks like aquamans art department jizzed on it
Ukrainian stealth sub memes with cheap fish finders needed PRONTO! KEK!
Ask and ye shall receive: https://greatawakening.win/p/17t1opDZQN/fake--gay-ukranian-stealth-sub-t/c/
It's like those "new" Navy stealth fighters that made the rounds a few years ago. Taken directly from the movie "Stealth". Those things wouldn't make it into the air, with all the crud mistakes.
“Golden” jizz? Very expensive or serious medical condition. /s
the jizz izznt golden. thats just what they used to apply the imitation gold leafing
Is pee-pee, no?
no.
Successful weapons or reconnaissance systems, like the U-2 or the SR-1, never advertise ahead of time, we always find out about them years after they have been in service. This silly article just invites Russian sabotage and/or close monitoring. Each new sub could be neutralized as it left the builder's port.
EDIT: One place I could see these being used successfully would be if the Narco gangs in Mexico and South America wanted a new way of smuggling drugs into America. Could the Coast Guard find these?
And... This is very likely fake. Why would you paint hi-viz stripes on a submarine intended to operate close to the surface attaching mines to ships. I would expect it to be colored for stealth.
diversity hires
Batman…
Top left “photo” looks photoshopped to put it in place of something that would be in airplane hanger. Big door looks like airplane hanger door. Why would a submarine be in an airplane hanger instead of a drydock of some sort?
GUCCI stealth sub for the smuggler wit dat style
ukrainian stealth sub memes incoming in 5....4...3...2...
That, I'd love to see! Bring it, frens!
I am not a submarine designer or an engineer. But my grease monkey bones say that is not a good design to accomplish what they say it can do. While it looks like it could be featured in the next DC comics movie, it seems to me that if you are trying to move stealthily through the water at high speeds you would want the smallest possible frontal area, not big wings.
exactly. cavitation is the #2 killer of subs
Hope it works better than the M1A1 tanks we sent over. Crushed like roaches.
So far, Russia has listed only one Abrams. It was apparently stripped of all the good stuff. On display at the Moscow "Trophies" event.
Incidentally, all that mil stuff bidan et al "sent" seems to have disappeared; pentagon and the rest of that crew stated long ago that "the shipments can't be traced past ports." I surmise that was part of the movie; I doubt that the CiC would allow it. Remember, bidan and pelosi both stated, when asked when the US would send troops to Ukr, "We aren't allowed to send troops."
I'm sure this is not a Ukrainian company.
Development was underway in 2022 by Highland Systems, a UK based company. It's built in the UAE
https://defence-blog.com/highland-systems-develops-futuristic-submarine/
http://highlandsystems.me/kronos-submarine/ Contact details are UK and UAE
Having been one of those ASW types, I'd love to see something like that at sea. We'd have had that sucker instantly. It would never survive. You can see quite a ways down under in clear ocean waters. End of story.
Besides the fakery, how many here really know the capabilities of current subs, or even the capabilities they had back in the 60s, when I was Navy? Guaranteed, precious few know; also guaranteed, USN didn't stop developing. Neither did Russia.
ive heard they can a pregnant whales calf or baby moving around inside the mother from miles away
The dipping sonar back when I was ASW was the AQS-13. A good operator could hear everything down there. Also, there are layers of warmer/colder waters; getting into a layer was easy, if the cable was long enough. Biggest problem was the helo noise, but the Navy developed a helmet that just about got rid of that: couldn't hear anything outside that headgear.
Operator could almost hear a couple crabs "duking it out on the floor". It was pretty easy to tell a sub class from the screw noise, and that's almost impossible to get rid of for a sub. They can be quiet, but not all quiet. Our max range was 20,000 yards, 360 degrees. A ping was 189 degrees, alternating between halves. I picked up a nuke, US, at the end of an exercise, over in Hawaii, at about 20k, tracked him all the way across (40k yards); that nuke boat was clocking in at around 54 kt under water. He was gone in a fairly short time, considering.
Aside from that, the mil does NOT divulge capabilities in any way other than the obvious. For instance, our helo was claimed to have a top end of 166 kt top airspeed. In the Nam, on a rescue up north, I was in one going 210 kt, just below tip stall. That's 199 mph vs 252 mph, roughly. They also hide operations and change history.
But that 'stealth sub' is a joke.
but didjya like my meme?
I did.
thank you very much, sir
Comms. Straight up.