Jon Harold posted his first article on Devolution in July of 2021, and continued to post installments after that. By Dec 2021, Harold had posted 15 installments in the Devolution series. (Currently up to Part 25)
Do you think it is possible that Johnson is taking someone else's research and repackaging that? Is it possible? Which came first? The chicken or the egg?
And before Jon it was Thomas Wictor https://social.quodverum.com/@ThomasWic
He was attacked both verbally and threatened for talking about Devolution early on. You will see he no longer post anything. In my opinion, every one of these individuals are a piece to the puzzle.
As far as I know, Jon H certainly recognizes that Wictor was the first one to bring up the notion of devolution, but its also true that Harold did a mountain of research on the topic that Wictor never presented.
I'm sceptical of Johnson ot necessarily because much or all of his content is bogus (most of it isn't as far as I can tell) but because of his approach and how he self-promotes with self-aggrandizing narratives...
Never heard of John Harold so I'm glad Johnson spoke up. Thr message is still on point, I don't give Johnson money and he has helped me red pill more people than anybody else.
In my own opinion, I don't think Johnson's message is actually on point, because of the critical issue of Potus and Cic. Even if the content he shares is 90% accurate, it doesn't necessarily mean that the other 10% also is.
But each to his own. I'm just sharing the things I found when digging in to Johnson, and some of the conclusions I drew for myself. Each of us has to draw our own conclusions, and I don't think anyone is 100% right all the time.
FYI, Johnson's website was created in September 2022.
https://au.godaddy.com/whois/results.aspx?itc=dlp_domain_whois&domain=https%3A%2F%2Fthedocuments.info%2F
Jon Harold posted his first article on Devolution in July of 2021, and continued to post installments after that. By Dec 2021, Harold had posted 15 installments in the Devolution series. (Currently up to Part 25)
https://patelpatriot.substack.com/
Do you think it is possible that Johnson is taking someone else's research and repackaging that? Is it possible? Which came first? The chicken or the egg?
asking for a fren...
And before Jon it was Thomas Wictor https://social.quodverum.com/@ThomasWic He was attacked both verbally and threatened for talking about Devolution early on. You will see he no longer post anything. In my opinion, every one of these individuals are a piece to the puzzle.
As far as I know, Jon H certainly recognizes that Wictor was the first one to bring up the notion of devolution, but its also true that Harold did a mountain of research on the topic that Wictor never presented.
I'm sceptical of Johnson ot necessarily because much or all of his content is bogus (most of it isn't as far as I can tell) but because of his approach and how he self-promotes with self-aggrandizing narratives...
I agree that Jon has done a lot of research that Wictor had not. Wictor was definitely ahead of everyone on Devolution.
I agree that Derek has own style that does not suit everyone.
When you think about it, so does Trump. We need to get beyond the style and look at the substance.
In my view, there are two primary aspects here. One, the substance itself, and two, the agenda of those engaging in the information war.
I don't personally feel like I have issues with Johnson's "style" but rather his agenda.
Never heard of John Harold so I'm glad Johnson spoke up. Thr message is still on point, I don't give Johnson money and he has helped me red pill more people than anybody else.
*Jon Harold
And thanks for sharing your experience.
In my own opinion, I don't think Johnson's message is actually on point, because of the critical issue of Potus and Cic. Even if the content he shares is 90% accurate, it doesn't necessarily mean that the other 10% also is.
But each to his own. I'm just sharing the things I found when digging in to Johnson, and some of the conclusions I drew for myself. Each of us has to draw our own conclusions, and I don't think anyone is 100% right all the time.