Every time someone questions Patriots in Control this is exactly what I explain to them.
Ive likened the phenomenon to the War in Europe after the breakout from hedgerow country. The course of events was set, Germanys defeat was no longer in doubt but the Germans still were able to mount the Battle of the Bulge in the Ardennes and shortly afterwards their spring offensive against the Russians in Hungary towards the gas and oil fields there.
Or the War in the Pacific after Midway.
In both the ultimate outcome was set but the enemy was not without the resources to cause trouble. This is where we are at.
Another one I like is the concept of a chess game. At some point, one of the players can gain enough control of the game board that the options of the other side constantly dwindle and dwindle with subsequent moves, until at some point, they have zero options and checkmate is complete.
The control does not start when checkmate is complete and the opponent has zero moves. In a game between masters, it starts much earlier and very often the opposing side is actually unaware that they have lost control until well into the 'controlled' phase.
I think the two analogies are complimentary. And in some ways, the war one speaks to certain realities - like the enemy still having capability to cause havoc, destruction or trouble - even while the overall direction is dominated by the Allies.
On a slightly tangential note, earlier on when Q was dropping, I thought the following was a good analogy to describe one aspect of the operation:
Think of a highly complex massive bomb that needs to be disarmed. It might take 1000 different steps to properly disarm it, with each step having its own risks. In this analogy, the global Cabal is the bomb. White hats had to take steps to disarm it step by step, and this takes time. And it's WHY it takes time, not something that can just be done all at once.
I think the first Trump administration was primarily about the disarming phase. So that the Cabal could not .... just drop a dirty bomb somewhere, or trigger meltdown somewhere, etc.
In this analogy, the disarming of the bomb (think 007 in Fort Knox disarming a nuclear device) required a very specific sequence and series of 'events' that culminated in a neutered Cabal.
So that the Biden/wakeup phase could take place with minimal concrete damage, the Cabal's capacity to detonate many of its previously existing boobytraps having been neutralized.
Every time someone questions Patriots in Control this is exactly what I explain to them.
Ive likened the phenomenon to the War in Europe after the breakout from hedgerow country. The course of events was set, Germanys defeat was no longer in doubt but the Germans still were able to mount the Battle of the Bulge in the Ardennes and shortly afterwards their spring offensive against the Russians in Hungary towards the gas and oil fields there.
Or the War in the Pacific after Midway.
In both the ultimate outcome was set but the enemy was not without the resources to cause trouble. This is where we are at.
Great analogies.
Another one I like is the concept of a chess game. At some point, one of the players can gain enough control of the game board that the options of the other side constantly dwindle and dwindle with subsequent moves, until at some point, they have zero options and checkmate is complete.
The control does not start when checkmate is complete and the opponent has zero moves. In a game between masters, it starts much earlier and very often the opposing side is actually unaware that they have lost control until well into the 'controlled' phase.
Your analogy is even better.
kek. Au contraire, mon frer!
I think the two analogies are complimentary. And in some ways, the war one speaks to certain realities - like the enemy still having capability to cause havoc, destruction or trouble - even while the overall direction is dominated by the Allies.
On a slightly tangential note, earlier on when Q was dropping, I thought the following was a good analogy to describe one aspect of the operation:
Think of a highly complex massive bomb that needs to be disarmed. It might take 1000 different steps to properly disarm it, with each step having its own risks. In this analogy, the global Cabal is the bomb. White hats had to take steps to disarm it step by step, and this takes time. And it's WHY it takes time, not something that can just be done all at once.
I think the first Trump administration was primarily about the disarming phase. So that the Cabal could not .... just drop a dirty bomb somewhere, or trigger meltdown somewhere, etc.
In this analogy, the disarming of the bomb (think 007 in Fort Knox disarming a nuclear device) required a very specific sequence and series of 'events' that culminated in a neutered Cabal.
So that the Biden/wakeup phase could take place with minimal concrete damage, the Cabal's capacity to detonate many of its previously existing boobytraps having been neutralized.
Or in chess where the outcome is known but the opponent still has moves...
^this