TL;DR
4000mg L-lysine/ day total, taken in (2) 2000mg doses on empty stomach or w/ a bit of juice/toast/carbs. Zero protein for minimum 2 hrs before AND 1 hr after Lysine
L-lysine absorption is impaired by protein. (Via amino competition)
4000mg Vitamin C/ day total, taken in (2) 2000mg doses on empty stomach or w/ protein meal. Zero Carbs for minimum 2 hrs before AND 1 hr after Vitamin C dose.
Vitamin C absorption is impaired by carbs. (Via glucose competition)
I would not waste my time on "slow release vitamin C"
Lysine and L-lysine are the same thing.
Vitamin C made out of fruit extracts, etc. is probably best because it's natural. But you need it in pill form. I've read that capsules are preferable over hard-pressed pills for absorption.
SCHEDULE: Do not skip!
Before you take a single pill: For yourself and for God,
WRITE. DOWN. A. SCHEDULE.
My FIL's dose and meal schedule was:
7am: 2000mg Vitamin C on empty stomach or w/ small protein meal. NO carbs 2 hrs before & 1 hr after.
9am: 2000mg L-lysine on empty stomach or w/ a some juice/toast/carbs. NO protein 2 hrs before & 1 hr after.
Noon to 5pm eat whatever.
8pm: 2000mg Vitamin C on empty stomach or w/ a protein snack. NO carbs 2 hrs before & 1 hr after.
10pm: 2000mg L-lysine on empty stomach or w/ some juice. NO protein 2 hrs before & 1 hr after.
I CANNOT OVERSTATE ENOUGH HOW CRITICAL IT IS TO HAVE A FOOD/SUPPLEMENT SCHEDULE TO AVOID COMPETITION W/ FOOD.
The HOW & WHY:
Linus Pauling, -the only one ever to win TWO unshared Nobel Prizes -invented this therapy when he discovered that the calcifications inside arteries featured a (molecular) "lysine binding site". This means Lysine gently but rapidly melts away blockages (arterial sclerosis) like a sugar cube in hot coffee.
The vitamin C helps heal the endothelial layer inside the arteries. Here's a mystery the medical establishment has never explained to you: why do the "clogs" start in larger arteries highest mechanical load, rather than the itty-bitty single blood cell wide capillaries? Any plumbers here?
Heart pumping produces higher mechanical load on all the stereotypical points where clogs are commonly found.
This causes microtears in the single cell layered interior of the artery. The endothelial cells. These microtears are normal and are healed via a process in which vitamin C is CHEMICALLY REQUIRED.
With insufficient vitamin C 'on tap,' sticky LDL cholesterol sticks to the scabby (if you will) wounds that don't heal properly inside the artery. This then builds on its self overtime.
I'd like to pause a moment to share a personal opinion:
If you are a cardiologist and the above questions regarding why arterial sclerosis forms predominantly in "the biggest pipes," and NOT the small micro capillaries have never occurred to you, then your worthless as a healer and should immediately RESIGN YOUR PROFESSION or educate yourself so you can ACTUALLY HEAL DESPERATE people starting NOW.
The reason why this ⬆️ particular failure in the profession is the biggest sin is because you almost certainly have a higher than average IQ.
And yet… You didn't have the stones or common sense TO DECIDE TO DO the thinking necessary, that God Himself gifted you with the mental horsepower to do *that would save most of your patients lives for $40 worth of supplements from CVS on their way home.
FAMILIES HAVE BEEN DECIMATED AND YOU (doctors) ARE IN A POSITION TO PUT AN ALMIGHTY END TO IT if you can reach down and find the balls to do it.
And finally... How I completely cleared out my father-in-law's arteries in 4-weeks. His scheduled Heart Stent procedure: Cancelled.
In 2011, my 47yo FIL was diagnosed with heart disease (arterial sclerosis) after a heart attack and had one stent put in. He smoked a pack a day and drank a 12 pack of Pepsi a day.
In 2015 he used to golfed w/ his friends several times a week. And one summer it got to a point where he would be too tired to do any more than 9 holes. After another month he was too tired to golf at all. Doctor did a heart scan 'with contrast' and found 3 clogs between 70% and 90%. His left ventricle ejection fraction was barely 40%. Doctor scheduled heart stent surgery (technically regarded as non-surgical).
When I heard about his situation I immediately asked him to postpone the procedure out to four weeks. He couldn't even work in this condition and he was very afraid to have such bad heart disease and only 51 so this was a big ask but knows that I am a strange breed when it comes to obscure research like this so he trusted me.
I put him on the Linus Pauling therapy exactly as stated above. You could add more shit to it (that might fuck with the absorption) but I'm telling you here what worked. TWICE.
During the procedure, but after I had already treated him, the doctor said his arteries were "clean as a whistle. Then the doc sort of got scared because he thought it was SO IMPOSSIBLE and that his office might have made a mistake and mixed up heart scans with another patient. Upon further checking, There was no mistake.
Father in law was 51, average build and couldn't walk across the room without getting out of breath. One week into the therapy he was playing 9 holes again. Two weeks in and he felt 100% normal. Went back to work.
Now here's the Encore: 3 years after the above
After his scheduled heart stent procedure was concluded with no stents put in, he immediately stopped the treatment and didn't do it again.
Flash forward to 2018 after continuing to smoke now TWO packs a day and drink a 12 pack of Pepsi a day, the same thing happened. He noticed it again when he was too tired to go more than 9 holes. On a Thursday, he passed out on the green and was taken by ambulance to the hospital. The next day a scan with contrast showed clearly three blockages, 2 @ 80% and the 3rd was near total blockage. His left ventricle ejection fraction was 20%. This is approaching heart failure. 54 years old.
His cardiologist scheduled emergency stent surgery and a mechanical 'rotor-rooter' type procedure for the following Monday. FIL tried to buy time w/ the Doc so he could do the treatment again. Doc said any more than 2 weeks would be life-threatening.
FIL call me up to ask the dosage/schedule again. Two weeks later on 'procedure' day the same thing happened. Catheter scope up the groin. Camera sees no blockages in the first 2 spots and only 20% in the one that was at near total blockage 15 days prior.
Doc abruptly ended the procedure with nothing needing to be done. ZERO STENTS AGAIN. The cardiac catheter camera was pulled from his groin and the doctor left the room.
As the nurses were wrapping everything up, the Doc and an unknown colleague (Doctor?) came back in with notepads and started asking questions.
TO BE CLEAR, two separate times the blockages were clearly visible. Two separate times he was on the table so to speak, with a cardiac catheter up his groin all the way to his heart and (after this therapy) both times there was nothing there and the catheter was withdrawn without mounting a single stent. It's now been 9+ years. He does two weeks of this regimen a few times a year and the problems have never returned.
WWGIWGA!
EDIT: The comments of people expressing such heartfelt thanks, and the Hope that pours off of their words as I read them -for what I assume is the renewing of their Faith that they can save themselves or a loved one- brings me more satisfaction that I can put into words. Thank you to the mods for sticking this so quickly.
With no disrespect meant to any other method, because there certainly are many, I bring you this here with such conviction for two reasons:
-
Linus Pauling was a genius biochemist, chemical engineer, etc, whose hard work and treatment I presented to you all here tonight, was purposefully obscured and -after his passing in 1994 at 93yo -suspiciously added to. (you'll see if you dig)
-
This is the method I know first hand works from my own personal experience with a family member and their baffled doctors. Twice. 3 years apart.
I am not a Doctor
Absolutely fantastic post, JohnTitor17.
I would like to add a bit from my own research and things I've learned, which supports what you wrote:
(1) Your FIL smoked a pack a day and drank a 12-pack of Pepsi (regular, I take it) per day. It has been known for some time now that smoking and sugar are the primary causes of heart disease. I assume you know that, which is why you stated those 2 things and not how many cheeseburgers he ate (which, contrary to what 99% of doctors are told, are not at all associated with heart disease).
(2) Glucose in the blood (which comes from ALL plant food ingestion) causes microtears in the interior cellular linings of blood vessels, and this is the beginning of heart disease for most people. Smokers are also known to have a 5-times higher rate of heart disease, though I have not investigated why, exactly.
(3) IMO, the HDL/LDL being "good" or "bad" is a scam. These are transporters of cholesterol, and the only difference is their direction. HDL is "Heading to Da Liver" and LDL is "Leaving Da Liver." Cholesterol is a necessary element of health. All cell membranes are made of it. All hormones are made of it. If the body needs more cholesterol, the liver sends it (via LDL) to wherever it is needed. Where excess is detected anywhere in the body, the liver sends a signal to bring it back (via HDL) for repurposing, as needed. There is no health problem associted with "high HDL" because it is merely transporting the cholesterol back to the liver. But when the body needs more than normal cholesterol, for whatever reason, the liver sends it out. There could be a number of reasons why. If a person has cancer, those cells multiply faster than normal cells, and maybe they need more cholesterol for the membranes. If a person is getting really fat, maybe more fat cells are needed. If a person is building muscle, maybe more muscle cells are needed. And if a person has microtears in their blood vessels, more cholesterol is needed because it acts to repair the microtears, similar to spackle used to repair a hole in dry wall. This is why "muh HDL = good" and "muh LDL = bad."
(4) I had never heard of or thought about cholesterol having Lysine receptors that could essentially "melt away" the cholesterol -- until this thread. But a quick scan of a couple of research articles/papers appear to support this thesis. I don't have time to dig into it, but very interesting.
(5) Regarding "every disease is parasite related," it would lend support for the Ivermectin and Fenbenzadol treatments. I think Thomas Seyfried has conclusively proven that cancer is caused by disruption to the mitochondria of the cells, which means that doctors are wrong (again!) about cancer being a genetic problem. It is actually a metabolic problem, and can be "cured" (nobody will use the "c-word") via nutrition. Would be interested to find out any info on if/how parasites might cause disruption to mitochondria, generally. Could be one of the keys to understanding human dis-ease.
Again, great post.
Might be worth doing the protocol for a month for general health and prevention of illness.
Actually, I am 100% shocked that the clogged arteries were completely cleared, and then clogged again -- IN JUST 3 YEARS!
I would not have thought it could happen that quickly.
I'd be careful about using this as a regular protocol. As you point out, cholesterol is required to repair and build cells, a necessary ongoing maintenance process.
In emergency cases like this one, clearing the cholesterol might be needed, both for immediate blood flow improvement but also simply to convince the doctors not to operate, but in general letting the cholesterol do its job is a good thing.
I agree. You probably would not want to do this as a regular routine.
But for a short time, could be beneficial to many.
Your body will make the requisite amount of cholesterol for its maintenance needs, especially if you have good nutrition. A healthy diet (carnivore / keto) is the long term answer.
I personally think this protocol is only useful (and evidently needed!) for an emergency situation like the one described, and I wouldn't do it for maintenance unless the person being treated regularly re-clogs their arteries for whatever reason. OP's FIL clearly falls into that category, proving that our bodies are remarkable and able to take a lot of abuse (or just adapt to a wide variety of circumstances) and to recover from it all.
Respect u/MAG768720
Now I'm speaking with a man who knows how to dig. It's not that hard but just from the above information, you're obviously not a desktop dummy sitting behind a screen.
Cigarettes and carbohydrates folks. And not necessarily in that order. If you ate only a cheeseburger (no bun) for every meal for a year you wouldn't even need to do the Linus Pauling therapy. Meat heals.
I believe the title was "Virtually all" disease is parasitic in nature. There's certainly diet related ones like our main topic. X-ray induced DNA damage related diseases, etc. etc.
Yeah after the first miracle that made him well again, he added another pack a day onto the cigarette habit. He works for Pepsi so a 12 pack a day is easy and free.
I was shocked it worked that quickly myself!
Great stuff! I'd be interested to read some sources for this comment: "Glucose in the blood (which comes from ALL plant food ingestion)". Can you provide?
This is something that is so well understood that I don't have any particular links for you.
All animals are made of protein and fat.
All plants are made of sugars ("carbohydrate" is just a complex set of sugars linked together).
When we eat protein, our digestive system breaks it down to its component amino acids (the building blocks of protein).
When we eat fat, our digestive system breaks it down to is component fatty acids (the building blocks of fat).
When we eat carbohydrates, our digestive system brakes it down to its building blocks -- sugars and fiber. Fiber is not digestible and will be disgarded in your bowels. Sugar will be processed as (a) fructose, which is processed in the liver and converted into alcohol, which can then be eliminated from the body in various ways), or (b) glucose, which becomes blood sugar and is used in the cells for current energy needs, with any excess stored as glycogen (a chain of glucose molecules together) or triglycerides (fat) as bodyfat, both of which are for future energy needs.
Lettuce has low calories and high fiber. So, the sugars will be minimal.
Bread is made from refined flour, which his high in calories, low in fiber, and will break down in the body as a lot of sugar, which will become blood glucose, which can easily be more than the body can handle with the excess converted to bodyfat.
Thanks for that overview. I appreciate your time. I am going to do this as I am 75% all beef diet right now. Great stuff.
Regarding point 2, I believe that raw fruit and vegetables pass through largely undigested, without converting to glucose, due to the cellulose structure of plant cells that prevent digestion. When cooked, the same vegetables and fruit now become digestible and covert to glucose in the body. This is why raw salads are good for you, not because they are good but because they are less bad, and regular (i.e., non-vegetarian) people who eat a lot of salads instead of cooked vegetables are skipping the absorption of carbs compared to those who eat fries and the like.
Fruit and vegetables are made mostly of carbohydrates and fiber.
Fiber is defined as that part of the plant that is not digestible in humans. So, it is true that fiber is not digested. It is turned into a mush in the stomach, then passes through the intestines and when it reaches the colon, the bacteria there will break some of it down, and the rest will be excreted. There is no health benefit to fiber; only harm. It harms us by creating abrasions throughout our digestive tract, all the way down.
Herbavores have bacteria in their stomachs, which can break down the fiber (i.e. "cellulose"), but we have none in our stomachs. Bacteria are the only thing on planet Earth that can break down fiber/cellulose.
In cattle, the grass is broken down by the bacteria in the animal's four chamber stomach, and converted into fatty acids. As the bacteria die off, they become protein, as well as any bugs that were ingested with the grass.
Thus, cattle function metabolically on protein and fat, and not on carbohydrates.
Humans also function on protein and fat, not on carbs -- even if you eat them.
In humans, the fiber is not digested, but the carbohydrates are ingested in the intestines. They are broken down into their component sugars: glucose for vegetables, and a combination of glucose and fructose for fruits.
Fructose is processed in the liver. Too much fruit can cause non-fatty liver disease.
The glucose goes to the liver. Some is sent to various cells of the body for energy. Cancer cells thrive on glucose. Healthy cells can function on glucose, but they function more efficiently on ketones, which come from fatty acids. Cancer cells cannot function at all on ketones.
Some of the glucose is converted to glycogen in the liver and muscles for future use, and any excess is converted into triglycerides, a form of fat, which is stored in the bodyfat cells.
People who are obese ate a lot of carbs to get that way.
Fruits and vegetables are broken down by the digestive system the same way. Whether raw or cooked, they covert to glucose or glucose/fructose.
No, they are bad for you.
Have you ever eaten a raw salad with NO DRESSING? I bet you haven't, or rarely do. Try eating ONLY a plate of leaves and nothing else.
It is absolute garbage, and you will not want to continue eating it.
The only reason people can even eat salads at all is the OTHER STUFF they put on them to make them edible.
ALL PLANTS HAVE CHEMICALS THAT ARE DESIGNED TO KILL ANIMALS.
ALL.
That means: ALL.
True, fruits are less toxic than the leaves and stalks of the plant, because the plant "wants" SOMETHING to eat it -- but not necessarily, YOU.
Plants cannot run or hide or claw or bite to defend themselves from being eaten and going extinct.
So, they create chemicals for defense. These chemicals are ALL toxic to one degree or another.
EVERY vegetable in your local supermarket -- EVERY ONE -- has a MINIMUM of 60 known human carcinogens, and most have over 100.
Every one of them has chemicals that created a toxic environment inside of your body when you eat them.
People cook potatos because they are toxic and can kill you if eaten raw.
Every one of the vegetables, along with the grains and legumes, have anti-nutrients in them that prevent the absorption of minerals from the other foods you eat. They also have protease inhibitors which block the absorption of aminio acids in the proteins you eat.
No, they are not skipping the absorption of the carbs. They are still getting them, along with the anti-nutrients. What is happening is they are getting LESS of them if they are ONLY eating vegetables, rather than the much higher calorie-dense combination of potatos (a starch, made of sugars) fried in toxic hydrogenated vegetable oils (a man-made, and not natural food substance).
They are still ingesting something bad, but maybe less of it.
I've eaten raw salad plenty of times. It is not horrible, and after one gives up sugar, the natural sweetness of spinach leaves is very appetizing. Tomato slices with a sprinkling of salt are also very tasty. But I'm not a big fan of vegetables anyway, so won't split hairs on the other points.