possibly just panes of glass popping out and catching reflected light...
let's keep believing it's a masterfully executed controlled demolition and not rag head zealots the CIA let into the country to guarantee an expansion of their budget.
9/11 was perpetrated by many actors... Our own government, the Israelis and Saudi Arabia to name 3... Bin Laden was a CIA asset as well... What ever story you choose to believe is up to you but the towers were brought down by controlled demolition as was building 7... Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, it may weaken it but not melt it... Also, the towers came down in their own footprint like a controlled demolition... Cheers anon... ☕️☕️☕️ EDIT: The melting temperature of girder steel is around 2750°F (1500°C), while the burning temperature of airliner fuel, such as jet-A fuel, is between 800°F to 1500°F (427°C to 816°C). This means that jet fuel is not hot enough to melt steel, but it can still cause significant damage to the structure
Fireproofing is a critical fire safety feature of steel high-rise structures because steel begins to elongate between approximately 800°F and 1,000°F, temperatures easily reached by normal residential and commercial contents fires.
The jet fuel would have burnt off quick and was gone by the time of collapse. It did have the effect of setting everything on fire at once, normal fires aren't like that.
Also, the towers came down in their own footprint
Check out the pictures I posted Building 6 would have been in touched if the debris was limited to the Tower's foot print.
You can see the outside columns of the Tower laying on the destroyed WT6 then a giant crater. Like Godzilla stepped on it.
It doesn't need to fucking melt it. Of course they came down in their own foot print, (which was larger than the footprint) the upper floors fell into the lower floors. You think someone was chopping down a tree at the base?
The structure was compromised. The floors below that big tipping mass weren't designed for 10'S OF THOUSANDS of pounds crashing down.
Btw a furnace can burn fuel hotter than an open pit. The combustion chamber of a jet engine can reach 3727°F, you don't know what temperature the towers reached, it's a meaningless point idiots keep throwing around thinking it will win their argument for them. It doesn't, so shove it.
We can rehash this over and over and never get anywhere... I've conceded the structural steel was damaged and or compromised but it doesn't change the fact that it was a controlled demolition... Have a blessed day and cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
what truth?
poor video
no way to source the original
no other accompanying videos or photos
possibly just panes of glass popping out and catching reflected light...
let's keep believing it's a masterfully executed controlled demolition and not rag head zealots the CIA let into the country to guarantee an expansion of their budget.
9/11 was perpetrated by many actors... Our own government, the Israelis and Saudi Arabia to name 3... Bin Laden was a CIA asset as well... What ever story you choose to believe is up to you but the towers were brought down by controlled demolition as was building 7... Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, it may weaken it but not melt it... Also, the towers came down in their own footprint like a controlled demolition... Cheers anon... ☕️☕️☕️ EDIT: The melting temperature of girder steel is around 2750°F (1500°C), while the burning temperature of airliner fuel, such as jet-A fuel, is between 800°F to 1500°F (427°C to 816°C). This means that jet fuel is not hot enough to melt steel, but it can still cause significant damage to the structure
It may? It does. How do think a blacksmith bends and shape metal
Did you read the Edit I posted??? Cheers...
I did see it, But 800°C is way above the danger zone. This is why steel in buildings is always coated with a fire resistant material.
Structural steel will soften at 425°C an at around 650°C, the steel will lose half of its strength
https://www.fireengineering.com/fire-prevention-protection/fireproofing-at-the-wtc-towers/#gref
The jet fuel would have burnt off quick and was gone by the time of collapse. It did have the effect of setting everything on fire at once, normal fires aren't like that.
Check out the pictures I posted Building 6 would have been in touched if the debris was limited to the Tower's foot print.
You can see the outside columns of the Tower laying on the destroyed WT6 then a giant crater. Like Godzilla stepped on it.
Cheers
It doesn't need to fucking melt it. Of course they came down in their own foot print, (which was larger than the footprint) the upper floors fell into the lower floors. You think someone was chopping down a tree at the base?
You see this shit?
https://files.catbox.moe/4xon0m.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/786jyi.jpg
The structure was compromised. The floors below that big tipping mass weren't designed for 10'S OF THOUSANDS of pounds crashing down.
Btw a furnace can burn fuel hotter than an open pit. The combustion chamber of a jet engine can reach 3727°F, you don't know what temperature the towers reached, it's a meaningless point idiots keep throwing around thinking it will win their argument for them. It doesn't, so shove it.
We can rehash this over and over and never get anywhere... I've conceded the structural steel was damaged and or compromised but it doesn't change the fact that it was a controlled demolition... Have a blessed day and cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Yes they planted explosives exactly where the planes impacted, special explosives which survived the impact and fire...
Controlled demolition my ass. You're disseminating a false narrative designed to discredit anything else you have to say.
I hope Israel goes up in fucking flames and takes every Zionist with them.
Fuck you.