possibly just panes of glass popping out and catching reflected light...
let's keep believing it's a masterfully executed controlled demolition and not rag head zealots the CIA let into the country to guarantee an expansion of their budget.
9/11 was perpetrated by many actors... Our own government, the Israelis and Saudi Arabia to name 3... Bin Laden was a CIA asset as well... What ever story you choose to believe is up to you but the towers were brought down by controlled demolition as was building 7... Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, it may weaken it but not melt it... Also, the towers came down in their own footprint like a controlled demolition... Cheers anon... ☕️☕️☕️ EDIT: The melting temperature of girder steel is around 2750°F (1500°C), while the burning temperature of airliner fuel, such as jet-A fuel, is between 800°F to 1500°F (427°C to 816°C). This means that jet fuel is not hot enough to melt steel, but it can still cause significant damage to the structure
Fireproofing is a critical fire safety feature of steel high-rise structures because steel begins to elongate between approximately 800°F and 1,000°F, temperatures easily reached by normal residential and commercial contents fires.
The jet fuel would have burnt off quick and was gone by the time of collapse. It did have the effect of setting everything on fire at once, normal fires aren't like that.
Also, the towers came down in their own footprint
Check out the pictures I posted Building 6 would have been in touched if the debris was limited to the Tower's foot print.
You can see the outside columns of the Tower laying on the destroyed WT6 then a giant crater. Like Godzilla stepped on it.
I'm not arguing that the steel wasn't weakened... My point was that building 7 was a controlled demolition... The edit stated that the structure would definitely be damaged by the heat of the jet fuel... Also from all the videos I've seen, the twin towers came straight down... If you have that much debris coming straight down, of course it's going to push things outward... it doesn't change the fact that the towers came straight down...
It doesn't need to fucking melt it. Of course they came down in their own foot print, (which was larger than the footprint) the upper floors fell into the lower floors. You think someone was chopping down a tree at the base?
The structure was compromised. The floors below that big tipping mass weren't designed for 10'S OF THOUSANDS of pounds crashing down.
Btw a furnace can burn fuel hotter than an open pit. The combustion chamber of a jet engine can reach 3727°F, you don't know what temperature the towers reached, it's a meaningless point idiots keep throwing around thinking it will win their argument for them. It doesn't, so shove it.
We can rehash this over and over and never get anywhere... I've conceded the structural steel was damaged and or compromised but it doesn't change the fact that it was a controlled demolition... Have a blessed day and cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Explain building 7 away then or did you not watch the video??? Where are all the pieces of the planes that "struck" the towers??? You can down vote me all you want but it doesn't make what I say any less valid... What about all the evidence that the khazarian jews had everything to do with this as well as our own government??? I suppose that's all a bunch of rubbish as well... I would recommend digging deeper than what the lamestream media says... Again, enjoy the rest of your weekend...
"Hey did you not watch this shit video which you were primed to believe it was a controlled demolition?" Yes I watched the shitty ass video attempting to prime me to believe it was a controlled demolition. I seen all the videos when they were contemporary long before they were re-uploaded, re-encoded, and selectively picked to push a false narrative.
The Gang / clan won't function if each doesn't get their cut. And Silverstein has a place in OZ and he can't be extradited from.......that's the best part of OZ....or is it something about Ali Babba ?
I remember the first time i used it, in a group of loudmouth 'my tv says you are wrong' folks. I used an overhead satellite picture of the site, and they lost it when the reasoning couldn't be defeated, and they became complete conspiracy theorists for their tvs.
Do you see the building with the word 'alamy' on it, above the WTC 1 & 2 derbis? That and the building to the right are severely damaged but still stood. But WTC7 (further north than those 2 buildings) collapsed mostly in its own footprint.
Look at the picture. The collapse of tower punched through the parts it hit like swiss cheese. It's like if you blasted through a door with a shotgun. You wouldn't say the door stood up.
You are correct. The original post is wrong to say that only the top floor is damaged, but that’s not really the point. Building 6 looks like one would expect it to look after the collapse of the twin towers. Building 7 looks waaaay different because it was imploded.
WTC 6 didn't get the memo.
u/#bahaha
Building 7.... https://x.com/Joanne60183156/status/1793365208700006860
Saved.. https://files.catbox.moe/rdtxio.mp4
Glad you did fren... Cheers... ☕️☕️☕️
what truth?
poor video
no way to source the original
no other accompanying videos or photos
possibly just panes of glass popping out and catching reflected light...
let's keep believing it's a masterfully executed controlled demolition and not rag head zealots the CIA let into the country to guarantee an expansion of their budget.
9/11 was perpetrated by many actors... Our own government, the Israelis and Saudi Arabia to name 3... Bin Laden was a CIA asset as well... What ever story you choose to believe is up to you but the towers were brought down by controlled demolition as was building 7... Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, it may weaken it but not melt it... Also, the towers came down in their own footprint like a controlled demolition... Cheers anon... ☕️☕️☕️ EDIT: The melting temperature of girder steel is around 2750°F (1500°C), while the burning temperature of airliner fuel, such as jet-A fuel, is between 800°F to 1500°F (427°C to 816°C). This means that jet fuel is not hot enough to melt steel, but it can still cause significant damage to the structure
It may? It does. How do think a blacksmith bends and shape metal
Did you read the Edit I posted??? Cheers...
I did see it, But 800°C is way above the danger zone. This is why steel in buildings is always coated with a fire resistant material.
Structural steel will soften at 425°C an at around 650°C, the steel will lose half of its strength
https://www.fireengineering.com/fire-prevention-protection/fireproofing-at-the-wtc-towers/#gref
The jet fuel would have burnt off quick and was gone by the time of collapse. It did have the effect of setting everything on fire at once, normal fires aren't like that.
Check out the pictures I posted Building 6 would have been in touched if the debris was limited to the Tower's foot print.
You can see the outside columns of the Tower laying on the destroyed WT6 then a giant crater. Like Godzilla stepped on it.
Cheers
I'm not arguing that the steel wasn't weakened... My point was that building 7 was a controlled demolition... The edit stated that the structure would definitely be damaged by the heat of the jet fuel... Also from all the videos I've seen, the twin towers came straight down... If you have that much debris coming straight down, of course it's going to push things outward... it doesn't change the fact that the towers came straight down...
What direction should we have expected them to fall?
What are the other options other than straight down.
It doesn't need to fucking melt it. Of course they came down in their own foot print, (which was larger than the footprint) the upper floors fell into the lower floors. You think someone was chopping down a tree at the base?
You see this shit?
https://files.catbox.moe/4xon0m.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/786jyi.jpg
The structure was compromised. The floors below that big tipping mass weren't designed for 10'S OF THOUSANDS of pounds crashing down.
Btw a furnace can burn fuel hotter than an open pit. The combustion chamber of a jet engine can reach 3727°F, you don't know what temperature the towers reached, it's a meaningless point idiots keep throwing around thinking it will win their argument for them. It doesn't, so shove it.
We can rehash this over and over and never get anywhere... I've conceded the structural steel was damaged and or compromised but it doesn't change the fact that it was a controlled demolition... Have a blessed day and cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
Yes they planted explosives exactly where the planes impacted, special explosives which survived the impact and fire...
Controlled demolition my ass. You're disseminating a false narrative designed to discredit anything else you have to say.
If you say so... Enjoy the rest of your weekend... Kekekekek...
Explain building 7 away then or did you not watch the video??? Where are all the pieces of the planes that "struck" the towers??? You can down vote me all you want but it doesn't make what I say any less valid... What about all the evidence that the khazarian jews had everything to do with this as well as our own government??? I suppose that's all a bunch of rubbish as well... I would recommend digging deeper than what the lamestream media says... Again, enjoy the rest of your weekend...
"Hey did you not watch this shit video which you were primed to believe it was a controlled demolition?" Yes I watched the shitty ass video attempting to prime me to believe it was a controlled demolition. I seen all the videos when they were contemporary long before they were re-uploaded, re-encoded, and selectively picked to push a false narrative.
I hope Israel goes up in fucking flames and takes every Zionist with them.
Fuck you.
Glad it helped... Cheers fren... ☕️☕️☕️
I think what you are trying to say is that WTC 6 was not vaxxinated, and WTC 7 took the jab. 💉👺🌎
The Insurance racket took the jab...or rather we the insurance buying public took / are taking it in the rear. How is your home insurance?
Yes, but is Silverstein going to have to return the “diamonds” d/t fraud? Or maybe the insurance carrier got a “cut” of the action too.
The Gang / clan won't function if each doesn't get their cut. And Silverstein has a place in OZ and he can't be extradited from.......that's the best part of OZ....or is it something about Ali Babba ?
I have been telling people this for years.
I remember the first time i used it, in a group of loudmouth 'my tv says you are wrong' folks. I used an overhead satellite picture of the site, and they lost it when the reasoning couldn't be defeated, and they became complete conspiracy theorists for their tvs.
Hard to call on that one, but take a look at this photo:
https://c7.alamy.com/comp/CWB8XY/world-trade-center-aerial-photograph-of-the-world-trade-center-taken-CWB8XY.jpg
Do you see the building with the word 'alamy' on it, above the WTC 1 & 2 derbis? That and the building to the right are severely damaged but still stood. But WTC7 (further north than those 2 buildings) collapsed mostly in its own footprint.
I didn't know this historical tidbit. Thank you.
And don't forget the "lucky Larry" story.
There's a couple of issues with this
WTC 7 did not fall during the collapse. Not even NIST makes that argument. So this is a strawman. WTC 7 fell hours later
Unlike WTC7, WTC 6 did suffer immediate catastrophic damage. Your image only shows a corner of the building.
The overhead view shows there was indeed a hole punched straight through.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/6_World_Trade_Center#/media/File%3A6-wtc-photo.jpg
Here's an overhead showing the relationship of the buildings
https://cc-production-uploads-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2017/11/WTC-Area-With-building-Numbers-Wikimedia-Commons-CMYK-WEB.jpg
the jews got paid to plant explosives in that one too, but, i mean, they're jews, what do you expect
How come this building didn't collapse at freefall speed?
WTC 6 suffered immediate catastrophic damage.
Have you seen this?
https://projects.voanews.com/ground-zero/images/800x-wtc6_9-11_credit_u.s._navy_photo_by_chief_photographer_s_mate_eric_j._tilford.jpg
You are correct, but the point is that building 6 did not freefall
I don't understand the distinction you're making.
Look at the picture. The collapse of tower punched through the parts it hit like swiss cheese. It's like if you blasted through a door with a shotgun. You wouldn't say the door stood up.
You are correct. The original post is wrong to say that only the top floor is damaged, but that’s not really the point. Building 6 looks like one would expect it to look after the collapse of the twin towers. Building 7 looks waaaay different because it was imploded.
that's what a building damaged by normal means looks like.
The OP's claim that the only the roof of WTC 6 was damaged is false.
Well sure but which looks more damaged, this or building 7?
Forgot the syrup is why it doesnt work.