It seems the majority of the post is you saying “here’s what they say they are doing and here’s why it can’t be happening”
The majority of my post is tldr Tucker Carlson posted the video, he doesn’t make claim either way what the guest is saying, but I suppose the whole point of his show is letting people make this fringe claims and not being told they can’t say these things.
I think it’s really telling at the end how he says
“Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
He is essentially saying no you’re not a conspiracy theorist, you’re just looking at your environment and noticing.
Now that we have cleared the "without a shadow of doubt" confusion, do you agree that as anons, we need to have standards where there needs to be some evidence beyond "I used to see no persistent contrails, but now I see it all the time" ? Because persistent contrails have been document in books as far back as 50s.
As far as Tucker is concerned - (and this applies to Elon Musk and everyone else as well) - we have to always keep our ears open to see if he is showing his true colors.
But in this case, its even more simple. Tucker had a guest who talked about it and he indicated that he doesn't know about it and she even indicated that it falls into the conspiracy theory realm.
Nowhere in this exchange is there any. reason to believe. "Tucker is saying this is real". My read is that this is the first time Tucker heard about it.
Hence the discussions. I was hoping to see how much evidence anons can dig up that backs the claims of chemtrails. However all everyone is doing is getting offended that I said something that goes against their belief system
Where did I say this? Did you read my full post? Did you read the very first line? What did I say about making claims that I said what I did not say?
I’ve just read it all. Maybe I misread.
It seems the majority of the post is you saying “here’s what they say they are doing and here’s why it can’t be happening”
The majority of my post is tldr Tucker Carlson posted the video, he doesn’t make claim either way what the guest is saying, but I suppose the whole point of his show is letting people make this fringe claims and not being told they can’t say these things.
I think it’s really telling at the end how he says
“Like NOTICING THINGS AROUND YOU AND WONDERING WHAT THEY ARE?”
He is essentially saying no you’re not a conspiracy theorist, you’re just looking at your environment and noticing.
Now that we have cleared the "without a shadow of doubt" confusion, do you agree that as anons, we need to have standards where there needs to be some evidence beyond "I used to see no persistent contrails, but now I see it all the time" ? Because persistent contrails have been document in books as far back as 50s.
As far as Tucker is concerned - (and this applies to Elon Musk and everyone else as well) - we have to always keep our ears open to see if he is showing his true colors.
But in this case, its even more simple. Tucker had a guest who talked about it and he indicated that he doesn't know about it and she even indicated that it falls into the conspiracy theory realm.
Nowhere in this exchange is there any. reason to believe. "Tucker is saying this is real". My read is that this is the first time Tucker heard about it.
Hence the discussions. I was hoping to see how much evidence anons can dig up that backs the claims of chemtrails. However all everyone is doing is getting offended that I said something that goes against their belief system