Why would anyone communicate using such an impractical and absurd method when they could use a numbers station, or encrypted code in a Craigslist message where you could communicate a much more meaningful message much more anonymously than blowing a building up?
Because with encrypted messages, even if the NSA can't crack the message, they can still see who the message is being sent to, but by putting the message in plain sight, they don't know who the recipients are.
100s of Millions of people have seen this video of chase bank now, but if it was some ad on craigslist, then maybe only a few 1,000 people would see it, and the NSA can track who saw it and narrow down the list.
It could also be the White hats sending threats to the deepstate.
Either side can trace the radio signal, find the number station and destroy it. Or just sit waiting at the numbers station and arrest whoever comes to use it. I'm not sure how number stations work, even if they are unmanned, the signal/message has to originate somewhere and they could trace the source. Hillary isn't going to be able to stay below the radar if she has a number station in her backyard.
Q has confirmed that comms like this exist, remember when Obama did the RED charity comms saying "Meet me in Seoul"
Obama also doing comms in the Jimmy Kimmel vid. He says "Big Red" instead of santa. And jokes about handing over the alien files, As Q said Obama was shopping for a new handler, so probably meant he was advertising to hand over his own blackmail files to a new puppet master or something
What number station are you destroying? How do you know that is the one that your enemies are actually using? It's hard to locate something that broadcasts on a timetable you don't know and can move anywhere within your hemisphere between broadcasts. The fact that number stations continue to broadcast suggests they aren't being destroyed.
Why would anyone communicate using such an impractical and absurd method when they could use a numbers station, or encrypted code in a Craigslist message where you could communicate a much more meaningful message much more anonymously than blowing a building up?
Because with encrypted messages, even if the NSA can't crack the message, they can still see who the message is being sent to, but by putting the message in plain sight, they don't know who the recipients are.
100s of Millions of people have seen this video of chase bank now, but if it was some ad on craigslist, then maybe only a few 1,000 people would see it, and the NSA can track who saw it and narrow down the list.
It could also be the White hats sending threats to the deepstate.
You don't send the encrypted message to anyone, you broadcast it on a numbers station.
Either side can trace the radio signal, find the number station and destroy it. Or just sit waiting at the numbers station and arrest whoever comes to use it. I'm not sure how number stations work, even if they are unmanned, the signal/message has to originate somewhere and they could trace the source. Hillary isn't going to be able to stay below the radar if she has a number station in her backyard.
Q has confirmed that comms like this exist, remember when Obama did the RED charity comms saying "Meet me in Seoul"
https://qalerts.app/?n=254
https://qalerts.app/?n=262
Obama also doing comms in the Jimmy Kimmel vid. He says "Big Red" instead of santa. And jokes about handing over the alien files, As Q said Obama was shopping for a new handler, so probably meant he was advertising to hand over his own blackmail files to a new puppet master or something
https://youtu.be/eoqYd39wkZs
What number station are you destroying? How do you know that is the one that your enemies are actually using? It's hard to locate something that broadcasts on a timetable you don't know and can move anywhere within your hemisphere between broadcasts. The fact that number stations continue to broadcast suggests they aren't being destroyed.