From a comment earlier but worth discussion: “Seems our whole system of “checks and balances” has a weak spot - the judiciary is not accountable to anyone but themselves, unlike the other branches. Once they’re entrenched it’s hard to remove them, and there’s no periodic review of their rulings and what type of cases they choose. It’s a place where corrupt or subversive elements could get into and hide out.”
Other than initial appointments, what checks and balances are there on the judicial branch? How could the system be improved moving forward?
The judicial system is corrupt because the people that appoint the justices are corrupt, or in the case of elected judges the same scum that gives you two choices of the same flavor of puppet also give you two choices of the same flavor of puppet for your judicial positions.
Getting rid of the cabal of evil power hungry elites is the only remedy.
Indeed...
u/#q15
Ah, the revolution starts tonight. :In a slavic accent: