The Supreme Court could expand the scope of their upcoming Presidential Immunity ruling given the ridiculousness of this trial. Since these charges were from 2017, they could fall under that.
Trump could also appeal to the Supreme Court on the grounds his constitutional rights were violated, but I read the Appeals Court needs to hear the case first.
People keep treating an appeal as if it’s guaranteed to overturn it. Some of the same people were swearing up and down the court would throw Braggs case out every other week during the trial.
Should really stop pretending any of the people prosecuting give a shit about the law and Legal Precedent. Or that an appeals court in the same bloody state will either. Hell the Supreme Court isn’t necessarily a guarantee either. They may refuse to hear it for whatever reason. And the precedent has been established for States and the Government to ignore Legal Decisions they don’t like. Albeit to much social unrest. But irrespective they can and have.
The Judiciary can’t do shit if the executive or Legislative isn’t willing to supply the Men and Guns necessary to enforce their decisions.
As the Supreme Court has found out already. The Apocryphal Jackson quote “John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it” springs to mind.
The thing is the crime that he didn't commit but was found guilty of, might not warrant jail time. However, the didn't want him found guilty to let him go. In my opinion they believe if they can get him behind bars they can give him the Epstein treatment and get away with it.
Even the shrieking leftist loons admit the verdict would get tossed by an appellate court - but they think it won't matter because that could take years and the election would long be over by then. The left knows full well they can't beat Trump in a fair, open election.
The election won't be fair and the results and counting process will be hidden from the citizens. Furthermore the sentencing won't be "fair" either. We are under siege right now.
The Supreme Court could expand the scope of their upcoming Presidential Immunity ruling given the ridiculousness of this trial. Since these charges were from 2017, they could fall under that.
Trump could also appeal to the Supreme Court on the grounds his constitutional rights were violated, but I read the Appeals Court needs to hear the case first.
People keep treating an appeal as if it’s guaranteed to overturn it. Some of the same people were swearing up and down the court would throw Braggs case out every other week during the trial.
Should really stop pretending any of the people prosecuting give a shit about the law and Legal Precedent. Or that an appeals court in the same bloody state will either. Hell the Supreme Court isn’t necessarily a guarantee either. They may refuse to hear it for whatever reason. And the precedent has been established for States and the Government to ignore Legal Decisions they don’t like. Albeit to much social unrest. But irrespective they can and have.
The Judiciary can’t do shit if the executive or Legislative isn’t willing to supply the Men and Guns necessary to enforce their decisions.
As the Supreme Court has found out already. The Apocryphal Jackson quote “John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it” springs to mind.
The thing is the crime that he didn't commit but was found guilty of, might not warrant jail time. However, the didn't want him found guilty to let him go. In my opinion they believe if they can get him behind bars they can give him the Epstein treatment and get away with it.
Don't be surprised if they try.
Even the shrieking leftist loons admit the verdict would get tossed by an appellate court - but they think it won't matter because that could take years and the election would long be over by then. The left knows full well they can't beat Trump in a fair, open election.
The election won't be fair and the results and counting process will be hidden from the citizens. Furthermore the sentencing won't be "fair" either. We are under siege right now.