Obama campaign was fined for failing to report millions of dollars in campaign donations during the 2008 presidential run. How did it end? In 2013, Obama campaign AGREED to pay the FEC a $375,000 fine, one of the largest fines in the agency's history. There was no indictment or conviction - The Great Awakening

Obama campaign was fined for failing to report millions of dollars in campaign donations during the 2008 presidential run. How did it end? In 2013, Obama campaign AGREED to pay the FEC a $375,000 fine, one of the largest fines in the agency's history. There was no indictment or conviction (twitter.com) - LOCK HIM UP! -

posted 158 days ago by lovecymru 158 days ago by lovecymru +91 / -0

4 comments

4 comments share save hide report block hide replies

Comments (4)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– supertootsday 4 points 158 days ago +4 / -0

It isn't a fine, its a kickback.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– BooniesRedneck 2 points 158 days ago +2 / -0

Didn’t Hildebeast have to pay a fine to the FEC? Something about a dossier.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– MEGAMAGAULTRA 1 point 158 days ago +1 / -0

Probably same position Michael puts him in.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– CherokeePede 1 point 158 days ago +1 / -0

This is the part that needs to be examined.Historically there us always something that gets paid and not accounted for. But with Trump there is no one who can say the NDA wouldn't have been paid out even if there wasn't an election. They claim because the run for office but he is not them. Multi-billion dollar man and business. Yeah, it would have been paid.

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q