Does being an "unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance" make someone forfeit their 2nd amendment right?
That's not a law anywhere I've ever heard of. This is all because the ATF decided to make a "rule" (not law) that forces FFL dealers to deny the purchase of a gun to anyone who answers yes to that question. It is done by self-selection and no due process.
So if someone is a regular weed smoker and wants to buy a gun, they can either answer truthfully and be denied or lie and commit a felony?
I think jury nullification is the right answer here, and will be very interesting if that happens, especially since judges typically hate anyone talking about it and won't allow any mention of jury nullification to potential jurors.
Jurry nullification works with only one jurror needed. This jury will find Hunter not guilty unanimously. This is all set up to intensify the optics of a rigged system intent on "getting Trump" while allowing the DS to walk.
It'd be the perfect opportunity to do so since liberals would be motivated to find Hunter innocent, and conservatives would be happy with it too since it'd leave all his other potential charges outstanding.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the least damaging, least constitutional, most beneficially precedent-setting charge was brought against him...
Hunter isn't the ultimate target here. He was the money mule. The high value targets are the politicians who committed treason & violated their oaths of office.
Hunter will not be convicted of anything. The jury will be "deadlocked" and the case will be tossed. It's all part of showing the people that the entire judicial system is thoroughly corrupt.
Because he's not going to jail, no matter the verdict or the sentence. Dear old dad will immediately pardon him. Which I think might be the point. Hunter gets a pardon, while President Trump gets a few decades in prison as his sentence. That should sting enough to wake a few more people up.
this could very well be the play but on the other hand the deep state may use ol Hunter as a sacrificial lamb for concealment....what better way for the potato to bow out ...pardon his son and then resign because of political suicide... never know. lets see how it plays out
Why wouldn't H. Biden want to reclaim knowing the contents on the drive could bury POPS & family.
Why would H. Biden risk turning over such material to a computer repair shop? [contents unrestricted?]
On purpose [years of being treated POORLY by 'Pop']
How do you introduce EVIDENCE legally?
How do you introduce [D]s high crimes [corruption] to the public?
I think the game here is the demonstration of "two tiered justice" - Trump vs Hunter
Correct. Coincidence Hunter trial was shortly after Trump trial?
Does being an "unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance" make someone forfeit their 2nd amendment right?
That's not a law anywhere I've ever heard of. This is all because the ATF decided to make a "rule" (not law) that forces FFL dealers to deny the purchase of a gun to anyone who answers yes to that question. It is done by self-selection and no due process.
So if someone is a regular weed smoker and wants to buy a gun, they can either answer truthfully and be denied or lie and commit a felony?
I think jury nullification is the right answer here, and will be very interesting if that happens, especially since judges typically hate anyone talking about it and won't allow any mention of jury nullification to potential jurors.
Jurry nullification works with only one jurror needed. This jury will find Hunter not guilty unanimously. This is all set up to intensify the optics of a rigged system intent on "getting Trump" while allowing the DS to walk.
He is not pleading guilty because he will be found innocent.
I always thought the strategy here would be that Hunter would appeal all the way to SC and that Form 4473 was unconstitutional.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ded.82797/gov.uscourts.ded.82797.40.0.pdf
It'd be the perfect opportunity to do so since liberals would be motivated to find Hunter innocent, and conservatives would be happy with it too since it'd leave all his other potential charges outstanding.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the least damaging, least constitutional, most beneficially precedent-setting charge was brought against him...
Hunter isn't the ultimate target here. He was the money mule. The high value targets are the politicians who committed treason & violated their oaths of office.
u/#q4822
u/#q4888
u/#q4889
u/#q4890
u/#q4891
u/#q4893
u/#q4917
u/#q4959
Hunter will not be convicted of anything. The jury will be "deadlocked" and the case will be tossed. It's all part of showing the people that the entire judicial system is thoroughly corrupt.
Because he's not going to jail, no matter the verdict or the sentence. Dear old dad will immediately pardon him. Which I think might be the point. Hunter gets a pardon, while President Trump gets a few decades in prison as his sentence. That should sting enough to wake a few more people up.
One of the jurors was a 2008 Hillary Clinton campaign donor and watches CNN/MSNBC.
this could very well be the play but on the other hand the deep state may use ol Hunter as a sacrificial lamb for concealment....what better way for the potato to bow out ...pardon his son and then resign because of political suicide... never know. lets see how it plays out
Considering the collection of addicts, a hung jury was a given.
All of them though? CA ... certainly possible.
Didn't the 5th circuit court of appeals already rule that drug use wasn't a reason for loss of 2A rights?
https://www.bradley.com/insights/publications/2023/08/fifth-circuit-upholds-marijuana-users-second-amendment-rights--will-the-eleventh-circuit-do-the-same.
Why wouldn't H. Biden want to reclaim knowing the contents on the drive could bury POPS & family.
Why would H. Biden risk turning over such material to a computer repair shop? [contents unrestricted?] On purpose [years of being treated POORLY by 'Pop']
How do you introduce EVIDENCE legally?
How do you introduce [D]s high crimes [corruption] to the public?
Your error is in thinking there will be a trial and verdict.
It’s already done, this is just theater.