I posted a while ago about a friend finally starting to see what i have been telling him all along, update
🫡 THE GREAT AWAKENING 🔆
He is now fully on his way to waking up. I got him to watch europa, mind you this guy knows the history that has been taught to us in indoctrination camps very well, so when he seen the alternative narrative, it blew his mind.
He realized how much more sense it made and immediatley was able to make the connection to what we are seeing now.
He just said he is going to watch a netflix hitler doc to see how much shit they lie about. I informed him things are going to get difficult to watch as you can pick our the fallke and gay shit easily.
This is truly amazing seeing him wake up, and it couldnt habe happened to a better friend!
NCSWIC
That’s a heap of “they” and “them” usage for a singular person.
Fun Fact
They and them, like any and who, can be either singular or plural—since at least the 14th century—before the invention of purple hair dye and face tackle :p
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they
Nine meanings are even listed in the Oxford English Dictionary for the pronoun 'themself', with first known use dating back to c. 1175. If anyone doesn't believe it, they can check for themself :)
https://www.oed.com/dictionary/themself_pron?tl=true&tab=factsheet
I don’t care about historic misuse or about dweebs at oxford. The lack of clarity causes confusion. special1ntere5t’s usage above seems to be a habit formed in fear of an ASD tantrum if the child’s delusions are not indulged. special1ntere5t is complaining about her child’s gender confusion and you’re encouraging her to use confusing genderless words.
If anyone is really confused when someone says "Does everyone have their pen," or "Regardless of who was the first person to say a mask will prevent viral transmission, they're wrong", that's a shame.
The fact remains that 'singular they' has been accepted usage in English for over half a millennium, and it isn't going anywhere.
Better examples of confusing usage are when an individual and a group are both being discussed and plural pronouns are used for the individual. You probably knew this but instead chose weak examples anyway.
We’ll see. If we can kick the satanic global commies out of the deep state, cleaning up the language might be easy in comparison.
What is your objective? I somewhat doubt that you’re a tranny sympathizer or a feminist. Do you find acceptance of lazy and imprecise pronoun usage to be personally expedient? Even if plural pronouns have been misused for centuries, you have to admit that the practice has rapidly accelerated and diversified in the last decade or so in conjunction with the globalists’ push for deviance acceptance. It has become a facet of the culture war, and obviously female or obviously male individuals who choose plural pronouns for themselves may claim it’s to show solidarity with the deviants, but really it’s to show disdain for normal people and to spite Christian culture. So why are you putting yourself on the wrong side of the culture war and trying to hide behind arguments of historical linguistics? Is it because you cynically see the other side as winning? (eg “it isn’t going anywhere”). Sadly, this traitorous strategy of sucking up to the perceived winners has become common in various types of battles. Maybe you just need more faith that wholesomeness and truth will win.
special1ntere5t’s repeated misuse of plural pronouns were about her gender-confused child, and not about a hypothetical or unknown third person singular like in your weak examples. Why do you use weak examples to try to encourage the indulgence of gender confusion? specialinterest’s plural pronoun misuse isn’t as confusing to us readers as it is to her child. She should refer to her child by the proper sex and manifest the child’s acceptance of it into reality. Re-read her comment if you must. The “they”s and “them”s are cringey and counterproductive: