effective at filtering out large and small particles , yet , they dont state any sizes…
Not peer reviewed…
All bullshit
I mean…. Look at the supporting players…
This research was supported by the Prometheus-UMD, sponsored by the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (agreement N66001-18-2-4015), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , (Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (contract 12-HHSN272201400008C), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (contract 200-2020-09528); by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; and by a gift from The Flu Lab.*
FWIW, there’s an interesting study that came out in 2022 that theorizes the danger of mask wearing for the exact same reason - exhaled COVID virus particles get trapped inside the mask and eventually are inhaled deeper into the lungs, which would in turn make the illness much worse.
I remember reading back then (sorry, no sauce) that researchers were trying to figure out why they were finding COVID-19 in some patients’ blood samples. One of the theories discussed was that the virus was crossing over into the bloodstream via the oxygen-blood transfer process in the alveoli of the lungs. If this is true, then this could possibly explain the Foegen Effect.
DARPA has done some really intriguing and groundbreaking research over the years. Its involvement isn't necessarily the red flag we think it is. And since the research does have direct implications for soldiers who may end up facing biological warfare attacks, they have a legitimate interest in the research.
The NIH funds 2/3s of all medical research in this country, so that's not quite the red flag we think it is either.
For me, the red flags are Billy Gates and CDC. CDC lied to me too many times with COVID, and I'm beyond tired of deconstructing their Bravo Sierra commentary when it comes to respiratory disease. They're trying to cover their backsides and pretend like they didn't change all of their definitions and statistical methodologies to push the COVID hoax by now acting like all of that was normal and good science.
I haven't read the study yet, but I'm going to guess right now that its methodology is highly specific and tailored to produce this result, and that this methodology looks absolutely nothing like real world use of these devices. If people don't wear them right, you don't get the advertised benefits.
Edit: just read the article, which is NOT the actual study, but they claim that cloth masks outperformed everything but the duckbill N95. That should send everyone's BS detector into the red.
MAGA University "Study shows that N95 mask, and any other mask, does not block airborne viruses. Thousands of MAGA individuals, can testify that MASK are irrelevant".
Just like that, we have another authentic study, from a real university...
effective at filtering out large and small particles , yet , they dont state any sizes…
Not peer reviewed…
All bullshit
I mean…. Look at the supporting players…
Conclusion: Fake and Gay
FWIW, there’s an interesting study that came out in 2022 that theorizes the danger of mask wearing for the exact same reason - exhaled COVID virus particles get trapped inside the mask and eventually are inhaled deeper into the lungs, which would in turn make the illness much worse.
I believe it’s called the “Foegen Effect.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35363218/
I remember reading back then (sorry, no sauce) that researchers were trying to figure out why they were finding COVID-19 in some patients’ blood samples. One of the theories discussed was that the virus was crossing over into the bloodstream via the oxygen-blood transfer process in the alveoli of the lungs. If this is true, then this could possibly explain the Foegen Effect.
You spelled Faggot Effect wrong.
😂😂😂
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, aka DARPA! That's ALL I need to know. It is ALL Bravo Sierra. Of course the sheeple don't know that....
DARPA has done some really intriguing and groundbreaking research over the years. Its involvement isn't necessarily the red flag we think it is. And since the research does have direct implications for soldiers who may end up facing biological warfare attacks, they have a legitimate interest in the research.
The NIH funds 2/3s of all medical research in this country, so that's not quite the red flag we think it is either.
For me, the red flags are Billy Gates and CDC. CDC lied to me too many times with COVID, and I'm beyond tired of deconstructing their Bravo Sierra commentary when it comes to respiratory disease. They're trying to cover their backsides and pretend like they didn't change all of their definitions and statistical methodologies to push the COVID hoax by now acting like all of that was normal and good science.
I haven't read the study yet, but I'm going to guess right now that its methodology is highly specific and tailored to produce this result, and that this methodology looks absolutely nothing like real world use of these devices. If people don't wear them right, you don't get the advertised benefits.
Edit: just read the article, which is NOT the actual study, but they claim that cloth masks outperformed everything but the duckbill N95. That should send everyone's BS detector into the red.
MAGA University "Study shows that N95 mask, and any other mask, does not block airborne viruses. Thousands of MAGA individuals, can testify that MASK are irrelevant".
Just like that, we have another authentic study, from a real university...
It's from Maryland. A bunch of liberal retards.
Yes. Fake & gey!