It’s not that it’s “amazing”, it’s about faith, belief, and what has been taught generationally for near 2000 years.
As Master Yoda said, “You must unlearn what you have learned.”
It’s going to take most, not all, but most years to accept that there is more to the Biblical stories than what “the church/Vatican” allowed in its editing of the Bible before the put out the KJV. And even the NIV. This also includes the Jewish books, the Koran, and anything “Christian/God/Christ” related.
These people will need to learn the Apocryphal Texts, especially the Books of Enoch, and even the Annunaki stories, South American (Inca/Mayan/Aztec) stories, Japanese, Chinese, Pacific islands, India/Hindu, and Norse Gods stories to understand thee entire picture of what Christ, God or even Gods wanted us to actually know.
And it’s all out there to research and help complete one’s belief and faith in what they want. Not what some random fanatics tell them.
I tend to agree with that to some extent, though less than gnostics.
The reason pre-trib ideation amazes me so much is that it isn’t harmonized with even what’s currently in the Bible itself, without even getting into how correct that selection is. The whole basis for the mode of thought is from having ones’ impression of it based wholly off what pastors and movies say. They even call it by a made-up name.
I understand that a lot of scriptures can be difficult to understand, but people should have some idea of where their ideas come from…
Once you wrap your head around the small number of textbook publishing companies over the past 100 years and how much revisionist history has happened in just that short of time, it's not too big a stretch to imagine the Good Book has also received "editing" over a couple millennia. There's going to be a lot of faith items to work through to get the real truth.
It’s not that it’s “amazing”, it’s about faith, belief, and what has been taught generationally for near 2000 years.
As Master Yoda said, “You must unlearn what you have learned.”
It’s going to take most, not all, but most years to accept that there is more to the Biblical stories than what “the church/Vatican” allowed in its editing of the Bible before the put out the KJV. And even the NIV. This also includes the Jewish books, the Koran, and anything “Christian/God/Christ” related.
These people will need to learn the Apocryphal Texts, especially the Books of Enoch, and even the Annunaki stories, South American (Inca/Mayan/Aztec) stories, Japanese, Chinese, Pacific islands, India/Hindu, and Norse Gods stories to understand thee entire picture of what Christ, God or even Gods wanted us to actually know.
And it’s all out there to research and help complete one’s belief and faith in what they want. Not what some random fanatics tell them.
I tend to agree with that to some extent, though less than gnostics.
The reason pre-trib ideation amazes me so much is that it isn’t harmonized with even what’s currently in the Bible itself, without even getting into how correct that selection is. The whole basis for the mode of thought is from having ones’ impression of it based wholly off what pastors and movies say. They even call it by a made-up name.
I understand that a lot of scriptures can be difficult to understand, but people should have some idea of where their ideas come from…
Once you wrap your head around the small number of textbook publishing companies over the past 100 years and how much revisionist history has happened in just that short of time, it's not too big a stretch to imagine the Good Book has also received "editing" over a couple millennia. There's going to be a lot of faith items to work through to get the real truth.