Snowden was CIA, and the ensuing scandal was meant to blind the prying eyes of the NSA from stopping Clowns.
If I recall correctly, Q indicated and anons figured out that Snowden was a plant that was supposed to discredit the NSA and bolster the position of the CIA. There was a struggle ongoing between NSA and CIA for supremacy in the intel community, and Snowden's mission was to disempower the NSA by means of his 'disclosure'.
I'll have to say that I essentially agree with the thrust of what's being said by Snowden/Amash, etc. I can't ever say I really trust such a program even when it's implied it's in the "white hats" hands.
But it is funny to see the press tied up in knots about this one agency when they're enthusiastic and dismissive of concerns about all others...
This is new. So this is a positive development?
His successor, Adm Mike Rogers, personally went to Trump Tower to warn him that his place was bugged.
Snowden was CIA, and the ensuing scandal was meant to blind the prying eyes of the NSA from stopping Clowns.
Biggest scandal of 2013 = SNOWden
Biggest film of 2013 = Frozen (Let I.T. Go)
Biggest game of 2013 = Last of U.S.
So yeah, there's a number of reasons why NSA and Q are seen to be on the same side.
Great reminder. I think you meant his predecessor. Rogers was NSA when Trump took office.
The IC hated two men more than others. Admiral Mike Rogers (NSA) and General Michael Flynn, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).
What ever happened to Rogers? He's been awfully quiet.
If I recall correctly, Q indicated and anons figured out that Snowden was a plant that was supposed to discredit the NSA and bolster the position of the CIA. There was a struggle ongoing between NSA and CIA for supremacy in the intel community, and Snowden's mission was to disempower the NSA by means of his 'disclosure'.
Snowden had a few comments on this hire.
https://x.com/matthew_d_green/status/1801649274398163166
https://x.com/Snowden/status/1801792686724182242
https://x.com/justinamash/status/1800950105224380721
I'll have to say that I essentially agree with the thrust of what's being said by Snowden/Amash, etc. I can't ever say I really trust such a program even when it's implied it's in the "white hats" hands.
But it is funny to see the press tied up in knots about this one agency when they're enthusiastic and dismissive of concerns about all others...
Very interesting. Thanks for the insight. I’ll have to dive further in to this guy. Any links of where to start?