Girls, beware!
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
He looks very shady to me! Safer to go with a neutered soyboy!
One with a man bun
Or maybe a bear.
They're desperate to stop these type of men from spreading their genes.
So true. Where was that profile when I was young and stupid!
Great find! u/Young_Patriot
Biblical polygyny (not polygamy) was one of the first casualties of satan's 'War On (big) Families.'
Allow me to explain.
As with the banning of priests from marrying and feminism, The Roman Catholic Church, with zero Biblical backing, twisted scripture to justify the "Deification of Mary" (circa 1951 Vatican council - i.e. praying to Mary, not Christ or our Heavenly Father)
The Roman Catholic banning of polygyny was also done by twisting scripture from clearly condoning it, into falsehoods against the practice. This is about the "deep church", and their role in quietly, slowly misleading Christians over the millennia.
Just like the deep state, the "deep church" is real and they have an agenda. And it's not God's agenda. And if you think it is, then what are you even doing on GAW?
I love that this will be such a tough pill for many to swallow while they cling to the false doctrines of the ROMAN Catholic Church to ease their discomfort in the idea.
The fact of the matter is that we have been Psyoped into believing it's a sin when it is not. If you're going to down vote, at least have the manhood to bring an intelligent rebuttal from the biblical perspective.
"Only a fool speaks on a matter he is not familiar with." -So research the topic thoroughly.
Obviously 21st-century women will not like this. I think Jesus talked about people like that… "They either love the tree and hate the fruit or hate the fruit and love the tree."
Both of my wives agree.
WWG1WGA!
Where in scripture is it promoted explicitly? Sure Abraham and solomon etc had many wives but doesn't make it acceptable to God per se. Genuinely curious
See my above reply to u/queue-anon
It helps if you see it through the lens that this battle we are facing is as old as time.
Starting to see a trend?
See it for what it is.
Do you think, in general, over time, people corrupted portions of the bible?
Does the bible state it's okay? Curious, not disagreeing with what you stated. I'm sure there are many things the Roman Cahtolic church has lied about. I always wondered why they seem to focus on Mary so much
u/queue-anon Disagreement is welcome!
Exodus 21:10: "If he take another wife for himself; her food, her clothing, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish".
Deut 21:15–17 states that a man must award the inheritance due to a first-born son to the son who was actually born first, even if he hates that son's mother and likes another wife more.
Here's a few Patriarchs from the Bible: Esau (Gen 26:34; 28:6-9), Jacob (Gen 29:15-28), Elkanah (1 Samuel 1:1-8), David (1 Samuel 25:39-44; 2 Samuel 3:2-5; 5:13-16), and Solomon (1 Kings 11:1-3)
I could go on but I think you get the idea…
Go back to Genesis- God gave Adam one woman Eve. Noah has 1 wife, each of his sons had 1 wife. We know Jacob wanted just the one wife, Rachel. Isaac had 1 wife. It wasn’t until after the Jews came out of Egypt that this idea of more than 1 wife took hold. Abraham did not take another wife until after Sarah died. Hagar was not a wife, she was a concubine and Abraham only slept with her because Sarah told him so that he could have a son, it wasn’t sanctioned by God.
What about Lilith?
Lilith isn’t in the Bible.
Genuine question, by the way, not a smart-alecky remark. (Not that I'm known for those, or anything...)
Esau is not a patriarch, he gave up his birthright, and definitely did not listen to God.
Plus he was, like, red-headed, and hairy, and stuff. Eww...
Oh come on! This has to be a Babylon Bee headline🤣🤣.