"ending the nationwide ban on the devices, which convert semi-automatic weapons to ones capable of firing hundreds of rounds per minute"
It's a stock, it doesn't convert anything. It just helps the user pull the trigger faster but the weapon is just as capable of firing that fast with or without the stock. Experienced shooters don't even need the stock, just a sling to do the same thing.
Very misleading for people who don't know about this stuff. "convert" would be dropping in a sear and selector switch to go full rock n roll. Which requires tax stamps and paperwork, extensive background checks, and a whole other layer of laws on storage and usage. Oh and the parts are several thousands of dollars for the legal ones.
Correct. I've done it without the "bump stock" and know a few that have gone through all that paperwork.
I'm just trying to find the angle they're aiming for with this one. Maybe just to simply put guns back on the docket for election cycle. idk. It's the weekend now for me, gonna go have people time now.
The ruling wasn't based on a 2nd Amendment argument. It was based on limitations of the power of 3-letter agencies to reinterpret laws, effectively creating new law with the power of imprisonment without Congressional approval. Think FDA, EPA, etc...
I've never understood the desire for a bump stock.
I can kill you more effectively with a single well placed round, and I have thirty attempts to get the job done if I miss the first one, which will be rare.
What part of will not be infringed don't some people understand?
So simple a 5th grader can explain it.
Except those who see but can not see or hear but can not
Accidental ? What is a Vaccine ?
Come on, let us go down, and there confound their language, that everyone perceive not another’s speech. -- Genesis 11:7
Who is "us" ?
Good, now I pull mine out of the safe once again.
Bullshit statement of the day
"ending the nationwide ban on the devices, which convert semi-automatic weapons to ones capable of firing hundreds of rounds per minute"
It's a stock, it doesn't convert anything. It just helps the user pull the trigger faster but the weapon is just as capable of firing that fast with or without the stock. Experienced shooters don't even need the stock, just a sling to do the same thing.
Very misleading for people who don't know about this stuff. "convert" would be dropping in a sear and selector switch to go full rock n roll. Which requires tax stamps and paperwork, extensive background checks, and a whole other layer of laws on storage and usage. Oh and the parts are several thousands of dollars for the legal ones.
Correct. I've done it without the "bump stock" and know a few that have gone through all that paperwork.
I'm just trying to find the angle they're aiming for with this one. Maybe just to simply put guns back on the docket for election cycle. idk. It's the weekend now for me, gonna go have people time now.
Have a good one fren
The ruling wasn't based on a 2nd Amendment argument. It was based on limitations of the power of 3-letter agencies to reinterpret laws, effectively creating new law with the power of imprisonment without Congressional approval. Think FDA, EPA, etc...
Thus it applies to ALL agencies........Coincidence ?
I've never understood the desire for a bump stock.
I can kill you more effectively with a single well placed round, and I have thirty attempts to get the job done if I miss the first one, which will be rare.