Elon Musk calls for an end to electronic voting.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
Or you know, we could use a blockchain. Like they were designed for
XRP or btc
Yes but ...
How would you ever know if your vote had been accurately passed by the machine into the blockchain system? You would need to ask a machine to display the blockchain records for you and that could be lying as well.
Like any other blockchain, you query the database.
It would be public, but with zero-knowledge-proof based so the voter can confirm their vote was accurate, and that it was processed. Can't lie in math.
Do you even know how a blockchain works? It's a public reciept list processed by a decentralized group of validators.
Anyone could see that their vote was tallied near instantly. There could never be any vote fakery if it was linked with standard identity documents (which would be like NFTs that couldn't be sold)
We have the technology, whole blockchains are already governed via voting already. It's used for validating parts back to their original factory, and ties in where the materials came from. It's just an advanced reciept system.
We've seen the fuckery happen with paper ballots. You have to trust people and trust hiring, and trust management. With blockchain type tech, it's trust-less, there is nothing to trust since it's mathematically self regulating
You are on to something, we need to push this blockchain technology further as it could be the potential solution to election fraud we've been waiting for
We need this installed ASAP to ensure no election is ever stolen in America ever again
But that can be made not to work. So it is not reliable. Sample program in no particular language:
Voting Enter Trump or Biden: If response="Trump" then Add 1 to TrumpVote Set cheat flag to True Else Add 1 to BidenVote Set cheat flag to False End
Counting If cheat=True then Add 1 to BidenVote Else Add 1 to BidenVote
Basically, a flag is set somewhere in the record that triggers the counting program to interpret the votes differently. Any checks on the database will look OK and only a detailed examination of every bit in the record will show up something unrecognised but most of the record will be hard to decode anyway.
The program is a bit simplistic because other candidates would also be present and the "cheat" might not be applied depending on some criteria - like Trump exceeding 95% of the Biden vote, for instance.
It is like the voting record that logged a vote for either all Republicans or all Democrats and Trump was listed as a RepubIican so did not match. Clue: the lower case "L" was actually an upper case "I" thus ensuring that those who voted Republican down the ballot would not automatically include a vote for Trump. Stuff can be hidden in all kinds of ways.
You still just don't get it. You can download the entire blockchain yourself, query it yourself. There's no middleman.
You would be able to see via your ID, what your vote was. The system is transparent, verifiable, all while retaining privacy for the users.
Which is why these types of systems should be open source, and run in a decentralized manner. Unlike the dominion digital voting, which is not.