Texas Judges are paid 66 cents on the dollar to their retirement fund for the amount of child support that is being paid off of their 'demands'. A program more expensive than some of the largest Defense contracts. Incentivized to break up families and then charge most amount possible4 child support.
(twitter.com)
đŸ¤¢ These people are sick! đŸ¤®
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
This should be unconstitutional and a denial of due process.
There is no way anyone's retirement funding should be tied to how much money they levy against someone.
The Supreme Court and their ruling today on "Administrative Hearings" may help the lawsuit against this similar grift.
I want to say there was a SCOTUS case in the 1920’s or 1930’s out of Ohio where the Judge would get paid with proceeds from fines the city issued and that was ruled as unconstitutional… though there were some oddities (the Mayor was the judge IIRC). I cannot find the name of the case though.
It's all the states because the feds are paying the money for this.
For any man facing this issue, go check out "Rick W" on Youtube.
He proves that family court is not a real judical court, but only an administrative hearing process, and you can refute all their claims and not be subjected to their demands.
He has many men having success with it.
That is good to know.
Not that I really have to worry about family court these days but I can spread the word and educate others.
Do you know who implemented this system, or where it’s origins could be found?
These people are .. I lack words.
Rick W does mention that, I think, but he has a ton of videos and I don't know which would get into that.
The system is set up where the feds (probably Health & Human Services) pays the states, and they run a kangaroo court to collect money outside of a lawful process.
The SCOTUS decision today might touch on this, since these are not judicial courts, but merely administrative hearings (this is why Rick W attacks their ability to do anything "just because they wants to").
If you can't have a jury, then it is administrative, not judicial.