Supposedly there was a “space shuttle cargobay passenger module” that could carry 2x26 people seated side by side in two rows (similar to C-5 galaxy jumpseats in cargobay). This would make capacity 60. And supposedly ‘Enterprise’ shuttle used for landing tests could be retrofitted for flight although there likely were more shuttles built than were public, making 5x60=300.
A similar cargobay passenger module was shown in one of the sci-fi space movies of the 1990s or 2000s.
EDIT: Module design may also have been 4x13 with four rows (2 sets of face-to-face). I have seen depictions of both.
Huh. Interesting I didn’t know that. As best I’ve been able to find in a quick search. That Module never existed anywhere aside from some proposed conceptual technical drawings of different variants.
Still if it did or does exist as part of some black project. It would by virtue of its existence imply the existence of extensive space infrastructure. Or it wouldn’t have a point to justify its existence.
Heck even the drawings existence alone would suggest someone was planning on the creation of extensive infrastructure
Unclear its true purpose. I am not convinced we can get outside the “firmament” from our present “terranium-like enclosure” at this location on Earth (may be possible from other locations of larger Earth). So the need for hauling 60 people up to top of a dome is clearly not a thing to me unless we have Helium balloons holding up “space stations”. If the moon is actually inside our dome and closer than reported, maybe the need to ferry 60 people at a time to a moonbase?
Our satellites appear to be attached to Helium balloons bumping up against “top of the sky dome structure” whatever it really is (Chinese balloon was likely a reveal). They are “orbiting” circularly inside, not around the Earth. Note massive Helium consumption and ownership by NASA since Sept 30, 1958 creation from NACA.
Supposedly there was a “space shuttle cargobay passenger module” that could carry 2x26 people seated side by side in two rows (similar to C-5 galaxy jumpseats in cargobay). This would make capacity 60. And supposedly ‘Enterprise’ shuttle used for landing tests could be retrofitted for flight although there likely were more shuttles built than were public, making 5x60=300.
A similar cargobay passenger module was shown in one of the sci-fi space movies of the 1990s or 2000s.
EDIT: Module design may also have been 4x13 with four rows (2 sets of face-to-face). I have seen depictions of both.
Huh. Interesting I didn’t know that. As best I’ve been able to find in a quick search. That Module never existed anywhere aside from some proposed conceptual technical drawings of different variants.
Still if it did or does exist as part of some black project. It would by virtue of its existence imply the existence of extensive space infrastructure. Or it wouldn’t have a point to justify its existence.
Heck even the drawings existence alone would suggest someone was planning on the creation of extensive infrastructure
Unclear its true purpose. I am not convinced we can get outside the “firmament” from our present “terranium-like enclosure” at this location on Earth (may be possible from other locations of larger Earth). So the need for hauling 60 people up to top of a dome is clearly not a thing to me unless we have Helium balloons holding up “space stations”. If the moon is actually inside our dome and closer than reported, maybe the need to ferry 60 people at a time to a moonbase?
Our satellites appear to be attached to Helium balloons bumping up against “top of the sky dome structure” whatever it really is (Chinese balloon was likely a reveal). They are “orbiting” circularly inside, not around the Earth. Note massive Helium consumption and ownership by NASA since Sept 30, 1958 creation from NACA.